Calculating the uncertainty with this measurement

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating uncertainty in a measurement using uncertainty propagation. The initial calculation yields a result of n = 1.68 ± 0.08, which some participants question due to its low uncertainty. A method to verify the computation involves evaluating the function's behavior around the measured value, suggesting that the uncertainty appears plausible. However, the uncertainty in the angle is noted to be higher than initially thought, with a comparison of tangent values supporting the calculated result. Overall, the findings indicate that the low uncertainty is justified based on the calculations presented.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
Be θ = (59,3 ± 1,2)° an angle, and n=tan(θ) a function. Obtain the uncertainty and the n with the right significant figures
Relevant Equations
\n
It is supposed to find it with the uncertainty propagation, so i tried by it.
$$\delta _{n} = \delta_{\theta}\frac{dn}{d\theta}=\frac{\delta _{\theta}\pi sec(\theta )^{2}}{180} = sec(59,3)^2*\pi*1.2/180$$
$$n = 1.68 \pm 0.08$$
But this uncertainty is quite low, so i am trying to understand if i made any mistake of if it is right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, in case you want to double-check your computation you can compute the following quantity:
$$f(x+\delta x)-f(x-\delta x)$$
this quantity should be, approximately, near to ##2\delta f##, in your case give ##0.16## so the uncertainty seems plausible.
 
LCSphysicist said:
this uncertainty is quite low
Not really. The uncertainty in the angle was 1 in 50; in n it is higher at 1 in 21.
 
Last edited:
tan(59.3º - 1.2º) = 1.61
tan(59.3º) = 1.68
tan(59.3º + 1.2º) = 1.77
In good agreement with n = 1.68 ± 0.08
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K