MHB Calculating Torques for Equilibrium of Truss System

paulmdrdo
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
I wonder if there's a physics person here who could help me solve this problem.

the loads applied to the truss shown in the figure cause reactions shown at A & D. A free body diagram of hinge A forms concurrent force system shown enclosed at A. Determine the magnitude of forces P & F directed respectively along bars AB & AE that maintain equilibrium of this system.
 

Attachments

  • statics2.png
    statics2.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 104
Mathematics news on Phys.org
LATEBLOOMER said:
I wonder if there's a physics person here who could help me solve this problem.

the loads applied to the truss shown in the figure cause reactions shown at A & D. A free body diagram of hinge A forms concurrent force system shown enclosed at A. Determine the magnitude of forces P & F directed respectively along bars AB & AE that maintain equilibrium of this system.

Hi LATEBLOOMER! :)

First step is to find all external forces based on the conditions for equilibrium ($\sum F_x = 0, \sum F_y = 0, \sum M_A = 0$).

Suppose the external force at A on the truss has 2 components $A_x$ and $A_y$, and similarly at D we have $D_x$ and $D_y$. Can you find these forces?
I suggest you start with calculating the moments of all external forces with respect to A.
 
I like Serena said:
I suggest you start with calculating the moments of all external forces with respect to A.

Just a comment: in US physics, at least, moments are called torques. See here and here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top