Calculating Vertical Height from Spring Potential Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter shotgunbob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the vertical height a mass will rise after being released from a compressed spring. The problem involves concepts from potential energy, specifically spring potential energy and gravitational potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy stored in the spring and its conversion to gravitational potential energy. There are questions about how to relate these energies to find the height the mass will rise to.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations for potential energy, while others are questioning the assumptions regarding the reference point for measuring height. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between spring potential energy and gravitational potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of gravitational potential energy and the reference point for height measurement, which may influence the interpretation of the results.

shotgunbob
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A .3 kg mass rest on top of a spring that has been compressed by .04 m. Neglect any frictional effects, and consider the spring to be massless. Then, if the spring has a constant k equal to 2000 n/m, to what height will the mass rise when the system is released.

Homework Equations



PE(spring)= (1/2)kx^2

KE= 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I got the PE in the system to be 1.6 J. I am not sure how this would translate into a vertical height. Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
shotgunbob said:
I got the PE in the system to be .48 J.
How did you arrive at this?

I am not sure how this would translate into a vertical height.
Consider gravitational PE.
 
Doc Al said:
How did you arrive at this?


Consider gravitational PE.

I messed up, used PE=1/2kmx^2 for some reason. I got 1.6 J.

And in Grav. PE, the H should be the same as the H I am looking for so PE(grav)=PE(Spring).
Or maybe I am missing something.
 
Ok I got .54 m when i put Pe(grave)=Pe(spring). Thats an answer choice! Is this correct?
 
It depends on what the height is being measured with respect to. The initial position on top of the spring? Or the compressed position?
 
I suppose its the top of the spring
 
shotgunbob said:
I suppose its the top of the spring
That's what I would say. :wink:
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K