Calculating When to Replace Cobalt-60

  • Thread starter Thread starter priscilla98
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time required to replace Cobalt-60 in a radiotherapy unit when its radioactivity falls to 75% of the original sample. Participants explore the mathematical modeling of radioactive decay, specifically using the half-life of Cobalt-60, which is 5.26 years, and the implications of different interpretations of the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the decay constant k as 0.1317 using the half-life formula.
  • Another participant suggests that the decay constant should be -0.1318 and proposes using the exponential decay formula to find time t.
  • There is confusion regarding the interpretation of "falls to 75%" versus "falls by 75%," leading to different calculations of time.
  • One participant initially calculates a time of 0.2852 years, which is questioned by others as being illogical given the half-life.
  • A later reply corrects the approach to find t using the natural logarithm of 3/4 instead of 1/4, leading to a new calculation of approximately 2.1827 years.
  • Participants express uncertainty and seek clarification on the correct interpretation of the problem and the calculations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct interpretation of the problem statement, leading to multiple competing views on the time required for replacement of Cobalt-60. There is ongoing debate about the correct application of the decay formulas and the implications of the initial conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the problem, particularly regarding the interpretation of the decay percentages and the application of logarithmic calculations. The discussion reflects various assumptions about the decay process and the mathematical steps involved.

priscilla98
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Cobalt-60 has a half-life of 5.26 year. The cobalt-60 in a radiotherapy unity must be replaced when its radioactivity falls to 75 percent of the original sample. If the original sample was purchased in November of 1996, when will it be necessary to replace the cobalt-60?

Homework Equations



ln ( No / Nt ) = kt

t 1/2 = .693 / k

The Attempt at a Solution



I know we can find k constant by using t 1/2 = .693 / k.

k = .693 / 5.26
k = .1317

And we can use the ln ( No / Nt ) = kt and for No = 75 and Nt = 25.

- Am I doing this right? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well since you are having a decay, your k value should actually be -.1318.

When it's radioactivity falls to 75% of the original, you will have only 1/4 of the original.
So now we have to play around with the exponential decay formula to get t. I'll give you the start.

\frac{1}{4} = e^{-.1318*t}, hope this gives you a start! Remember that we are looking for t in years :D
 
MysticDude said:
Well since you are having a decay, your k value should actually be -.1318.

When it's radioactivity falls to 75% of the original, you will have only 1/4 of the original.
So now we have to play around with the exponential decay formula to get t. I'll give you the start.

\frac{1}{4} = e^{-.1318*t}, hope this gives you a start! Remember that we are looking for t in years :D

Right, out of 75 percent, only 25 percent would be left. But I'm a little confused about this problem. Okay, when you plug in e^(-.1318) = .8765. Okay wait I see the approach you're taking to solve this.

1/4 = (.8765) (t)
.25 = (.8765) (t)
.2852 = t
 
Does it seem logical that 75% of a substance will be gone in .2852 years when half-life is only 5.26 years? No right?
I see your mistake though.
I would have done:
\frac{ln(\frac{1}{4})}{-.1318} = t I would get to this by taking the natural log of both sides only living me with ln(\frac{1}{4}) = (-.1318)t then dividing both sides by -.1318.

Do you understand what I'm saying?
 
MysticDude said:
Does it seem logical that 75% of a substance will be gone in .2852 years when half-life is only 5.26 years? No right?
I see your mistake though.
I would have done:
\frac{ln(\frac{1}{4})}{-.1318} = t I would get to this by taking the natural log of both sides only living me with ln(\frac{1}{4}) = (-.1318)t then dividing both sides by -.1318.

Do you understand what I'm saying?


Okay, I'm pretty sure I understand. Okay, therefore, it would be 10.52 years.
 
Yes and now to answer the question, we would have to add 10.52 years to the year 1996, which is 2006.52. So in 2006.52, you would have 75% of the Cobalt-60 gone :D
 
Okay thanks a lot.

- Have a good weekend :)
 
priscilla98 said:
The cobalt-60 in a radiotherapy unity must be replaced when its radioactivity falls to 75 percent of the original sample.

Falls TO 75%, not BY 75%.
 
Borek said:
Falls TO 75%, not BY 75%.

OH GOSH, I must have read "Falls 75%"...wow.

In other words, t should be 2.1827 years. Making it 1998.1827. Wow, makes me wonder why I can screw up some physics problems. Thanks Borek.

SORRY priscilla98 :(
 
  • #10
MysticDude said:
OH GOSH, I must have read "Falls 75%"...wow.

In other words, t should be 2.1827 years. Making it 1998.1827. Wow, makes me wonder why I can screw up some physics problems. Thanks Borek.

SORRY priscilla98 :(

It's okay but how did you get 2.1827 years? Thanks a lot
 
  • #11
Well k is still the same, the only thing I changed is what is on the left of the equation.
I originally had this:
<br /> \frac{ln(\frac{1}{4})}{-.1318} = t<br />
but now I just had this:
<br /> \frac{ln(\frac{3}{4})}{-.1318} = t<br />

That's all :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
38K