Calculus: Maximum point for revenue function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum revenue for a company based on its pricing strategy for transistor sets. Participants explore the formulation of the revenue function, considering both continuous and discrete variables, and analyze the implications of different order sizes on revenue.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a revenue function as R(x) = (550 - 5x)x for x > 50, questioning its correctness.
  • Another participant challenges this formulation, suggesting that the revenue function should account for the price reduction only on orders exceeding 50 sets, leading to the function R(x) = x(550 - (x - 50)5).
  • A later reply introduces a piecewise defined revenue function, R(n), indicating that the independent variable is discrete, with different expressions for orders below and above 50 sets.
  • This piecewise function is analyzed, noting that the maximum revenue occurs at n = 80, which is derived from the vertex of the parabolic portion of the function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial formulation of the revenue function, as one participant corrects another's approach. However, there is agreement on the maximum order size being 80 sets based on the analysis of the piecewise function.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the revenue function and its dependence on the order size. The transition between linear and parabolic portions of the function is noted, but the implications of these transitions are not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in understanding revenue maximization in a pricing context, particularly those studying calculus or related mathematical concepts.

Doffy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello (Smile). I have been stuck on this question for a while.

A company charges $550 for a transistor set on orders of 50 or less sets. The charge is reduced by $5 per set for each order in excess of 50 sets. Find the largest size order company should allow so as to receive a maximum revenue.

I have tried to formulate the revenue function as: R(x) = (550 -5x) x, for x > 50.
Am I right? The answer mentioned in book is 80 sets.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your revenue function isn't right...we are only subtracting \$5 per set in excess of 50 ordered, hence:

$$R(x)=x(550-(x-50)5)$$

So, simplify and factor, and then you know that the vertex will lie on the axis of symmetry which will be midway between the two roots.
 
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.
 
Doffy said:
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.

What we should actually write for the revenue function is a piecewise defined function:

$$R(n)=\begin{cases}550n, & 0<n<51 \\[3pt] 5n(160-n), & 50<n \\ \end{cases}$$

I used $n$ rather than $x$ to indicate that the independent variable is discrete rather than continuous. Then we may plot this function:

View attachment 5104

We see that the linear portion of the function increases at a constant rate (given by the slope of the line), and then we should observe that the parabolic portion of the function opens downward (since the coefficient of the squared term is negative) and so its maximum will be at the vertex, which lies on the axis of symmetry, which will be midway between the roots, at $n=0$ and $n=160$, which is:

$$n=\frac{0+160}{2}=80$$

Since this value is to the right of where the linear and parabolic portions "meet," we may conclude:

$$R_{\max}=R(80)$$
 

Attachments

  • piecewise_revenue.png
    piecewise_revenue.png
    7 KB · Views: 113

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K