MHB Calculus: Maximum point for revenue function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum revenue for a company selling transistor sets, with a price reduction for orders exceeding 50 sets. The initial revenue function proposed was incorrect; the correct piecewise function is R(n) = 550n for 0 < n < 51 and R(n) = 5n(160 - n) for n > 50. The maximum revenue occurs at the vertex of the parabolic portion of the function, which is calculated to be at 80 sets. This conclusion is supported by the analysis of the function's behavior and the axis of symmetry. The final result indicates that the company should allow orders of up to 80 sets to maximize revenue.
Doffy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello (Smile). I have been stuck on this question for a while.

A company charges $550 for a transistor set on orders of 50 or less sets. The charge is reduced by $5 per set for each order in excess of 50 sets. Find the largest size order company should allow so as to receive a maximum revenue.

I have tried to formulate the revenue function as: R(x) = (550 -5x) x, for x > 50.
Am I right? The answer mentioned in book is 80 sets.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your revenue function isn't right...we are only subtracting \$5 per set in excess of 50 ordered, hence:

$$R(x)=x(550-(x-50)5)$$

So, simplify and factor, and then you know that the vertex will lie on the axis of symmetry which will be midway between the two roots.
 
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.
 
Doffy said:
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.

What we should actually write for the revenue function is a piecewise defined function:

$$R(n)=\begin{cases}550n, & 0<n<51 \\[3pt] 5n(160-n), & 50<n \\ \end{cases}$$

I used $n$ rather than $x$ to indicate that the independent variable is discrete rather than continuous. Then we may plot this function:

View attachment 5104

We see that the linear portion of the function increases at a constant rate (given by the slope of the line), and then we should observe that the parabolic portion of the function opens downward (since the coefficient of the squared term is negative) and so its maximum will be at the vertex, which lies on the axis of symmetry, which will be midway between the roots, at $n=0$ and $n=160$, which is:

$$n=\frac{0+160}{2}=80$$

Since this value is to the right of where the linear and parabolic portions "meet," we may conclude:

$$R_{\max}=R(80)$$
 

Attachments

  • piecewise_revenue.png
    piecewise_revenue.png
    7 KB · Views: 99
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top