MHB Calculus: Maximum point for revenue function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum revenue for a company selling transistor sets, with a price reduction for orders exceeding 50 sets. The initial revenue function proposed was incorrect; the correct piecewise function is R(n) = 550n for 0 < n < 51 and R(n) = 5n(160 - n) for n > 50. The maximum revenue occurs at the vertex of the parabolic portion of the function, which is calculated to be at 80 sets. This conclusion is supported by the analysis of the function's behavior and the axis of symmetry. The final result indicates that the company should allow orders of up to 80 sets to maximize revenue.
Doffy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello (Smile). I have been stuck on this question for a while.

A company charges $550 for a transistor set on orders of 50 or less sets. The charge is reduced by $5 per set for each order in excess of 50 sets. Find the largest size order company should allow so as to receive a maximum revenue.

I have tried to formulate the revenue function as: R(x) = (550 -5x) x, for x > 50.
Am I right? The answer mentioned in book is 80 sets.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your revenue function isn't right...we are only subtracting \$5 per set in excess of 50 ordered, hence:

$$R(x)=x(550-(x-50)5)$$

So, simplify and factor, and then you know that the vertex will lie on the axis of symmetry which will be midway between the two roots.
 
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.
 
Doffy said:
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.

What we should actually write for the revenue function is a piecewise defined function:

$$R(n)=\begin{cases}550n, & 0<n<51 \\[3pt] 5n(160-n), & 50<n \\ \end{cases}$$

I used $n$ rather than $x$ to indicate that the independent variable is discrete rather than continuous. Then we may plot this function:

View attachment 5104

We see that the linear portion of the function increases at a constant rate (given by the slope of the line), and then we should observe that the parabolic portion of the function opens downward (since the coefficient of the squared term is negative) and so its maximum will be at the vertex, which lies on the axis of symmetry, which will be midway between the roots, at $n=0$ and $n=160$, which is:

$$n=\frac{0+160}{2}=80$$

Since this value is to the right of where the linear and parabolic portions "meet," we may conclude:

$$R_{\max}=R(80)$$
 

Attachments

  • piecewise_revenue.png
    piecewise_revenue.png
    7 KB · Views: 100
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top