Calulating Atomic Percentages given moles and weights of compounds

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating atomic percentages of copper and chloride in a slurry containing zinc sulfide. The original paper states 0.6 atom % Cu and 0.34 atom % Cl based on 3 mL of 0.2N Cu(CH3COO)2 and 1.7 mL of 0.2N NH4Cl solutions, respectively. However, the calculations presented by users reveal discrepancies, with their results yielding only 0.145 atom % Cu and 0.165 atom % Cl. The confusion arises from the ambiguous use of equivalent concentrations and the lack of clarity regarding the reference for atomic percentages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic percentages and mole fractions
  • Familiarity with normality and molarity in solution chemistry
  • Basic proficiency in Excel for calculations
  • Knowledge of chemical species involved, specifically ZnS, Cu(CH3COO)2, and NH4Cl
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of atomic percentages and how they relate to mole fractions
  • Learn about normality and its implications in chemical calculations
  • Explore the differences between equivalents and moles in redox reactions
  • Investigate the formation of copper(I) complexes and their relevance in chemical recipes
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in inorganic chemistry, and anyone involved in calculating atomic percentages in chemical solutions.

Squall
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is the statement out of a paper:

Slurry 10 grams of ZnS with 3mL of .2N Cu(CH3COO)2 solution (corresponding to 0.6 atom % Cu) and 1.7 mL of .2N NH4Cl solution (corresponding to 0.34 atom % Cl)

So my question is how did they calculate the .6 at. % and .34 at. % from the information given

Homework Equations



The only equations I could find were for mole fractions and converting from weight percent to atomic percent, but by implementing these techniques I was still not able to reproduce the stated percentages.

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to solve this using excel by calculating wt. percent then converting it to atomic percentages and my numbers are smaller than the ones given.

I have also done mole fractions and that doesn't seem to be the right way either

My at. % of Cu was only .145 and for Cl it was .165
I accounted for all species present

I will appreciate any guidance for I have been stuck on this for days
Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a problem with a very strange concept of atoms % that has been used in the paper. It is easy to see where they get their figures from: 3 mL of 0.2 N makes 0.6 meq of copper ion, while 1.7 mL of 0.2 N makes 0.34 mmol of chloride ion that is being slurried with the 10 g of zinc powder.

But atoms % should mean a ratio of atoms per 100 atoms. 100 atoms of what? there is no clear relationship between mmol and 100 mmol of anything in particular. Ant there is also the problem of use of an outdated and ambiguous concentration unit. Because copper(II) is formally a doubly charged ion, is an equivalent equal to 1 mol or 0.5 mol. If we are looking to reduce copper(II) to metallic copper, it should be 0.5 mol, but reading between the lines I suspect that the recipe you are looking at is for formation of some copper(I) chloro- or ammino- complex, and that we can read meq as mmol.

The problem does not seem to rest with you, it is with some very strange units and notations in the original recipe.

In the recipe as you have presented it, we have 0.6 mmol of copper and 0.34 mmol of chloride in a slurry with 10 g of Zn powder -- obviously a vast excess. atom % is a weird fiction, the way the authors have used it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K