Can a 10x Bigger Fly Still Fly with the Same Wing Surface? | Homework Solution"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ayr4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a fly, increased in size by a factor of ten, would still be able to fly with the same wing surface area. The problem touches on concepts of lift, mass, and the relationship between size and flight capability in insects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of increasing the size of the fly on its lift capacity and weight. There are discussions about the relationship between wing surface area and the volume of the fly, as well as the potential for muscle power to affect flight capability.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the original poster's reasoning about the increase in lift and weight is valid. There is a recognition that without sufficient lift capacity relative to the increased weight, the fly would struggle to fly. However, there is no explicit consensus on the matter, and various interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific information regarding the weight and wingspan of the fly, which may affect the analysis. Additionally, there are considerations regarding the structural integrity of the fly's body in relation to increased forces.

Ayr4
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lets say we have a normal fly/mosquito. Then we increase its size by 10x (10 times bigger). Before we increased its size it could fly just like a normal fly would.

The question is, would the fly be able to fly now, when its size have been increased by 10x?
The only thing we are considering is whenever it would have enough liftpower to manage to fly. (not in muscle and power terms, but by the mass of the fly compared to the size/span of the wings)

We were not informed of the weight or the wingspan of the fly.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My first thoughs was that because the fly have now increased in size by 10x, and the surface of the wings are sqare (m2) then the surface of the wings would be 10x10, or 100 times bigger, but the volume(m3) of the fly would be increased by 10x10x10, or 1000, and therefor there wouldn't be enough surface with lift on the wings, and therefor the fly wouldn't be able to fly...

But is this idea correct? Or would the fly still be able to fly?

Sorry for my bad formulations, language and my lack of math skills.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

That would seem to be correct. The fly might still be able to fly if it's lift capacity was initially 10 times its weight, but ... I think we can expect that nature and evolution have not built that kind of over capicity into the current blueprint for a fly.
 
Ok, so unless the fly had to begin with a lift capacity of 10 times its body weight it would be unable to fly now?
 
And that's why flies who have eaten too many Christmas puddings crash to the ground.
 
What would be the best way to explain this to someone who thinks that the fly would still be able to fly, and who thinks that the wing surface after its size have been increased is enough to lift the entire fly?
 
Ayr4 said:
What would be the best way to explain this to someone who thinks that the fly would still be able to fly, and who thinks that the wing surface after its size have been increased is enough to lift the entire fly?

While lift may be increased by a factor of 100 over the surface of the fly's wing, the load has been increased by a factor or 1000 due to the increased volume of its mass.

This would be comparable to an un-enlarged fly trying to lift off with 10 times its weight.
 
LowlyPion said:
While lift may be increased by a factor of 100 over the surface of the fly's wing, the load has been increased by a factor or 1000 due to the increased volume of its mass.

This would be comparable to an un-enlarged fly trying to lift off with 10 times its weight.

That was what i told him, but he told me that even if the fly got 10 times heavier it would also get 10 times more liftpower...

Btw, if we also consider muscle power, would the muscles of the fly be able to lift it?
 
Ayr4 said:
That was what i told him, but he told me that even if the fly got 10 times heavier it would also get 10 times more liftpower...

Btw, if we also consider muscle power, would the muscles of the fly be able to lift it?

Make a necklace of 9 dead flies and tie it on to a live fly and see how far it goes.

When looking at muscle power, I'd say the strength comes from the cross sectional area not the volume. It will be a factor of 100 area-wise, hence 100 stronger, but it will need it for the 100 area wise increase in surface area of the wing. This will produce 100 times the lift of a regular fly, but alas it needs 1000 fold increase. Because of the 1000 times weight it will of course put it at some disadvantage with respect to gravity. (This completely overlooks the structural requirements that will need to be met to prevent the exoskeleton from collapsing under the increase in forces - which of course is wholly unproductive weight power wise.)
 
Last edited:
Hehe, okay :approve:

Thanks a lot for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
11K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K