Can a bijection be extended to three dimensions?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LordCalculus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection Definition
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
LordCalculus
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Can the definition of a bijection be extended to three dimensions? So for example,

f(a, b) = c, where f : N X N [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] N
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


According to set theory, bijection can be defined between any two sets - including Rn and Rm. :)
 


I don't see why not. To see it in the example you ask, you have to have a function which connects two sets.

The problem might arise if you say that in the first row of the set NxN there is the same number of elements as there is in the set N, so that excludes injection.

But, if you change the way you count the elements of the NxN and count in this order:

n_11,n_21, _n12, n_31, n_22, n_13 ...

Then a bijection is a possibility :)

[tex]\begin{Bmatrix}<br /> n_{11}\; n_{12}\; n_{13}\; ... \\ <br /> n_{21}\; n_{22}\; n_{23}\; ... \\ <br /> n_{31}\; n_{32}\; n_{24}\; ... \\ <br /> n_{41}\; n_{42}\; n_{25}\; ... \\<br /> \vdots \;\; \; \vdots \; \; \;\; \; \vdots \; \; \;\; \; ... \\<br /> \end{Bmatrix}[/tex]