Can a gamma initiate weak decay of a proton?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that a gamma photon can initiate the weak decay of a proton, represented by the reaction p + γ → n + e+ + ν_e, provided the gamma photon possesses sufficient energy. Participants agree that there are no fundamental prohibitions against this reaction occurring. The conversation also highlights the relationship between known interactions, such as p + γ → p + e+ + e-, and electron capture, suggesting a plausible pathway for the proposed decay process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak decay processes in particle physics
  • Familiarity with gamma photon interactions
  • Knowledge of proton decay mechanisms
  • Basic principles of particle conservation laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the energy thresholds required for gamma-induced proton decay
  • Explore the cross-section calculations for gamma interactions with protons
  • Investigate existing experimental evidence of gamma-induced weak decays
  • Study the implications of combining known particle interactions in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in nuclear physics, and students studying weak interactions and gamma radiation effects.

Philip Wood
Gold Member
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
79
Does this ever happen?

p + \gamma \rightarrow n + e+ + \nu_e

It seems possible, if the \gamma has enough energy, but I wonder if anyone can confirm that it happens.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Philip Wood said:
Does this ever happen?

p + \gamma \rightarrow n + e+ + \nu_e

It seems possible, if the \gamma has enough energy, but I wonder if anyone can confirm that it happens.

While I have no idea of whether this could happen in practice, or what the cross section would be, I don't see anything to fundamentally prohibit it. In fact, it strikes me you could look at this as combining two well known interactions that do occur:

p + gamma -> p + e+ + e-

then, electron capture. Combine, and you get the proposed reaction. This supports the view that there shouldn't be anything fundamental prohibiting this.
 
Thank you. This does indeed make it seem even more plausible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K