Can a high-compression engine run on low octane fuel without knocking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jethead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a high-compression engine, specifically one with a compression ratio of 13:1, can operate on low octane fuel (approximately 87 octane) without experiencing knocking. Participants explore various engine designs, fuel injection methods, and the implications of compression ratios on fuel requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that direct injection at the end of the compression stroke, similar to diesel engines, could allow a high-compression engine to run on low octane fuel without knocking.
  • Others argue that the maximum compression ratio for 87 octane fuel is typically around 7:1, with some suggesting it could be higher, possibly up to 10:1 or 11:1, depending on various factors such as timing advance.
  • One participant mentions existing direct injection engines that achieve high compression ratios but typically require premium fuel.
  • Another participant provides an example of a Toyota engine that operates on regular unleaded fuel with a compression ratio of 10:1, noting minimal power differences between regular and premium fuels.
  • Some participants share personal experiences of running high-compression engines on lower octane fuel without detonation, citing various modifications and conditions that affect performance.
  • There is mention of the impact of factors such as effective cylinder pressure, cam timing, and fuel-air management on the ability to run high compression ratios with lower octane fuel.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between camshaft timing and effective compression ratio, indicating that larger cams may require higher static compression ratios to avoid knocking.
  • Another participant shares experiences with boost pressure on lower compression ratios using different octane fuels, highlighting the role of engine setup in performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of running a high-compression engine on low octane fuel, with no consensus reached. Some believe it is possible under certain conditions, while others maintain that traditional limits on compression ratios for low octane fuel should apply.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various engine designs, modifications, and conditions that could influence the performance and knocking behavior of high-compression engines running on low octane fuel. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the specific conditions under which these engines might operate effectively.

jethead
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can a direct injection petrol engine of compression ratio 13:1, or around that much, be designed to run on fuel of low octane number, say about 87, without knocking? I think it is possible if the fuel is injected just at the end of the compression stroke like in a diesel engine. Is there such an engine?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just look for the label "GDI" on any new vehicle.

GDI= Gasoline Direct Injection
 
Yeah. But what I'm wondering is this:
87 octane number fuel can be used for a maximum compression ratio of 7:1 or so. Any higher compression and it'll require higher octane fuel. Could 87 RON gasoline be used in an engine that has 13:1 compression ratio without engine knocking? My thoughts- YES! With properly timed direct injection like in a diesel engine.
 
jethead said:
87 octane number fuel can be used for a maximum compression ratio of 7:1 or so.

That sounds a bit low to me, I think the maximum compression is closer to something like 10:1 or 11:1 depending on timing advance.

Still, that's a rule of thumb for a conventional fuel injected engine, not a direct-injection one. There are already direct injection engines achieving what you're talking about, although the ones I've seen do specify premium fuel:

Audi USA said:
Arrangement Front mounted, longitudinal

Bore 3.37 in. [92.8 mm]

Type 3.2 liter DOHC V6 gasoline engine with FSI direct injection and Audi valvelift system

Stroke 3.65 in. [85.5 mm]

Displacement 3.2 liter [195.1 cu. in., 3197 cc]

Fuel Requirement Premium unleaded

Compression Ratio 12.5:1

Horsepower 270 hp @ 6500 rpm

Torque 243 lbs. ft. @ 3000 rpm
http://models.audiusa.com/q5/detailed-specifications?engine=66
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Toyota makes naturally-aspirated conventionally-injected engines with 10.0:1 compression ratios which run on regular unleaded (at decreased power). Notice the power difference isn't much between regular and premium though:

Wikipedia said:
The 1GR-FE is the 4.0 L (3956 cc) version, designed for longitudinal mounting in RWD and 4WD pickup applications ... Output is 236 hp at 5200 rpm with 266 lb·ft of torque at 4000 rpm on 87 octane, and 239 hp at 5200 rpm with 278 lb·ft at 3700 rpm on 91 octane. This engine features Toyota's VVT-i, variable valve timing system on the intake cam and a compression ratio of 10.0:1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_GR_engine#1GR-FE
 
Last edited:
Thanks Mech. I believe it's possible after all.
 
you can take a 13 to one engine and run it on lower octane fuel ...i have done it and no detonation...here is general rule of thumb..
compression ratio denotes octane...there are a lot of side issues like effective cylinder pressure, cam timing ( lift duration opening and closing ramps..) scavenging, fuel- air density, fuel droplet syspension..etc...

in general,,if yo u have a 9 to 1 compression engine, you can add one point of compression if you replace an iron cylinder head with aluminum...now we are at 10 to 1
if you plumb outside cold air to intake ..add another point to the CR..now we are at 11 to 1
if you go to quench technology on the piston to cylinder head area ..add another 1 point so we are at 12 to 1 where i stopped modifcation..i did use latest CD ignition...ran this 493 cid engine on pump gasoline...never any pinging or sign of detonation and my trips into 7000 rpm plus range...with proper fuel injection and fuel air management I think 13 to 1 is possible...old NASCAR iron monsters over 420 cid ran 14 to 15 to 1 CR...effective ( once engine was fully up to op temperatures..water.. oil ) effective CR being key word here
but...you have to know what you are doing

btw ..todays Pro Stock drag engine are running 16 to 1 CR
if you are running a stock engine..not purpose built...

PUMP FUEL

8.5:1- Non-quench head road use standard sedan, without knock sensor.

8.5:1- Quench head engine for tow service, motorhome and truck.

9.0:1- Street engine with proper .040" quench, 200° @ .050" lift cam, iron head, sea level operation.

9.5:1- Same as 9:1 except aluminum head used.

Light vehicle and no towing.

10:1- Used and built as the 9.5:1 engine with more than 220° @ .050" lift cam. A knock sensor retard is recommended with 10:1engines.
 
Last edited:
Very encouraging! With intake air and fuel cooling, it's definitely going to work.
 
With VVT the camshaft timing changes the true compression ratio. The static CR can be what ever you want it to be- the bigger the cam, the more static CR you NEED because the true CR drops with the early/ late valve timing of a huge cam. Unfortunately, the driver comfort of a big cam- and the emissions- suffer greatly.
 
  • #10
I've run 8 pounds of boost on a 7.4 to 1 with 87 octane (dished pistons...no quench) and 10 pounds of boost on a 8.5 to 1 with 93 octane (high quench setup) for about 30,000 miles each.

My initial timing was 20 degrees.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
23K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
5K