Can a Hypothetical Object Exist if it Does Not Satisfy a Universal Rule?

Thread starter Berislav
Start date Jun 7, 2005
Tags

Idea

Click For Summary

The discussion revolves around the concept of universal rules and their implications, particularly focusing on the paradoxes that arise when an object does not satisfy a hypothetical universal rule. Participants explore the nature of these rules, arguing that if a rule is absolute and undiscriminating, it cannot be paradoxical; if it is proven incorrect by an object, it ceases to be absolute. The dialogue delves into the definitions of rules, existence, and satisfaction, emphasizing that without clear definitions, one cannot determine if a rule is satisfied. The conversation also touches on the relationship between existence and properties, suggesting that non-existent objects cannot be meaningfully discussed within the framework of established rules. The idea of absolute universal rules is challenged, with assertions that such rules must be reevaluated when exceptions are found. The discussion concludes with reflections on the nature of knowledge, belief, and the limits of human understanding in relation to abstract concepts and the universe.

Aug 29, 2005

sarika harikumar

hypothetical object'

sir,
may i ask u something.if a hypothetical law is satisfied by every object then,how can an object exist which does not satisfy this law?so everything will be hypothetical isn't it?
i don't know a thing about philosophy,but i just wanted to ask,that's all.hope u'll surely reply me
sarika harikumar