Can a Maximally Rotating Black Hole be Defined by the Kerr Metric?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
10 replies · 5K views
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi steve:

Having problems with LaTex. see attached
 
Attachments
Last edited:
It's also worth noting that when charge is included, Jmax becomes-

[tex]J_{max}=M^2\sqrt{1-\frac{Q^2}{M^2}}[/tex]

which means the following should also apply-

[tex]Q_{max}\equiv M\sqrt{1-\frac{a^2}{M^2}}[/tex]

The above can reduce (for a maximal BH) to-

[itex]a^2+Q^2=M^2[/itex]

where [itex]M=Gm/c^2,\ a=j/mc[/itex] and [itex]Q=C\sqrt(G k_e)/c^2[/itex]

where M and Q are mass and charge in geometric units and m and C are the SI units respectively, a is the spin parameter (normally J is used for both geometric and SI units for angular momentum but for some clarity I've used j to represent SI units and J to represent geometric units).

where there's no charge-

[tex]J_{max}=M^2[/tex]

for a non-maximal, non-charged rotating black hole-

[tex]J=Ma[/tex]

(while wiki are happy to use [itex]\alpha[/itex] to represent the spin parameter, this could get confusing later on when using the redshift or reduction factor in Kerr metric which is more commonly represented by [itex]\alpha[/itex] also).

Event horizons for a black hole with both spin and charge (Kerr-Newman) is represented by-

[tex]r_{\pm}=M \pm \sqrt{M^2-Q^2-a^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
stevebd1 said:
(while wiki are happy to use [itex]\alpha[/itex] to represent the spin parameter, this could get confusing later on when using the redshift or reduction factor in Kerr metric which is more commonly represented by [itex]\alpha[/itex] also).

So it would be less confusing if I used the symbole [itex]a[/itex]? What would be a common symbole (good symbole) to use for the dimensionless spin parameter:

[tex]\frac{cJ}{GM^2}[/tex]

I've seen [itex]a_{*}[/itex] and [itex]\chi[/itex].
 
Imax said:
What would be a common symbole (good symbole) to use for the dimensionless spin parameter:

[tex]\frac{cJ}{GM^2}[/tex]

I've seen [itex]a_{*}[/itex] and [itex]\chi[/itex].

[itex]a_{*}[/itex] or [itex]a^*[/itex] appear to be used the most to represent a/M though I've also seen [itex]\bar{a}[/itex].
 
Imax said:
Having problems with LaTex. see attached
I think I may have solved my problem with Latex. This is what was in the attachement:

[tex]4\alpha^2=4\left ( \frac{J}{Mc} \right )^2=4\frac{J^2}{M^2c^2}=r_s^2=\left ( \frac{2GM}{c^2} \right )^2=4\frac{G^2M^2}{c^4}[/tex]

Isolating J gives the maximum angular momentum as:

[tex]J_{max}=\frac{GM^2}{c}[/tex]

And also limits a to:

[tex]\alpha_{max}=\frac{J_{max}}{Mc}=\frac{1}{Mc}\left ( \frac{GM^2}{c} \right )=\frac{GM}{c^2}=\frac{1}{2}r_s[/tex]

Seems like hitting the preview button too many times is not a good idea.
 
The angular momentum J for any black hole should be between 0 and [itex]J_{max}[/itex], so, for any black hole, J can be defined as some fraction of the maximum:

[tex]J=a_*J_{max}[/tex]

[tex]0\leq a_*\leq 1[/tex]

with [itex]a_*[/itex] a dimensionless spin parameter:

[tex]a_*=\frac{J}{J_{max}}=J\frac{1}{J_{max}}=\frac{cJ}{GM^2}[/tex]

The value [itex]a_*=0[/itex] corresponds to a Schwarzschild black hole and [itex]a_*=1[/itex] to an extreme Kerr black hole. According to this equation, the value of [itex]a[/itex] for any black hole is:

[tex]a=\frac{J}{Mc}=a_*\frac{J_{max}}{Mc}=\frac{a_*}{2}r_s[/tex]

If, for any black hole, the radius [itex]r[/itex] can be expressed as a multiple of [itex]r_s[/itex] then

[tex]r=nr_s[/tex]

[tex]n=\frac{r}{r_s}[/tex]

[tex]n\geq 1[/tex]

Substituting [itex]r[/itex] with [itex]nr_s[/itex] and [itex]a[/itex] with

[tex]\frac{a_*}{2}r_s[/tex]

can simplify (??) some equations.
 
As an example, according to Wiki, the Kerr Metric is equivalent to a co-rotating reference frame that rotates with angular speed [itex]\Omega[/itex], and this angular speed depends on both the radius [itex]r[/itex] and the colatitude [itex]\theta[/itex]:

[tex]\Omega =- \frac{g_{t\phi}}{g_{\phi \phi}}=\frac{r_sarc}{\rho^2(r^2+a^2)+r_sa^2 r \sin^2\theta }[/tex]

[tex]\rho ^2=r^2+a^2\cos^2\theta[/tex]

Substituting [itex]r[/itex] with [itex]nr_s[/itex] and [itex]a[/itex] with

[tex]\frac{a_*}{2}r_s[/tex]

gives, after about a page of math, something like:

[tex]\Omega =\frac{c}{r_s}\left ( \frac{8na_*}{16n^4+4n^2a_*^2+4n^2a_*^2\cos^2\theta+4na_*^2\sin^2\theta+a_*^4\cos^2\theta } \right )[/tex]

Or

[tex]\Omega =\frac{c}{r_s}p(n,a_*,\theta)[/tex]

The angular speed is given by the speed of light divided by the Schwarzschild radius times a polynomial [itex]p(n,a_*,\theta)[/itex] which is a dimensionless scale factor given by:

[tex]p(n,a_*,\theta)=\frac{8na_*}{16n^4+4n^2a_*^2+4n^2a_*^2\cos^2\theta+4na_*^2\sin^2\theta+a_*^4\cos^2\theta }[/tex]

[tex]n=\frac{r}{r_s}=\frac{rc^2}{2GM}\geq 1[/tex]

[tex]a_*=\frac{J}{J_{max}}=\frac{Jc}{GM^2}\leq 1[/tex]
 
?

Are you trying to suggest that a singularity would ease to exist if its radial velocity was approx. 15% of "c"?
 
Cold Winter said:
?

Are you trying to suggest that a singularity would ease to exist if its radial velocity was approx. 15% of "c"?

If [itex]J>J_{max}[/itex] then the event horizon becomes imaginary with components of
[itex]\sqrt{-1}[/itex]. The event horizon could disappear, leaving a naked singularity o=).

Where did 15% of c come from?
 
Last edited: