Can a Non-Genius Write a Convincing Genius Character?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cybernetichero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genius
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether a writer who is not a genius can convincingly create a genius character. It highlights that writing does not require the author to possess the same level of intelligence as their characters. Authors can portray genius through compelling narratives and character development, even if they lack expertise in the character's field. The conversation references Sherlock Holmes and his reliance on outdated pseudoscience, suggesting that even celebrated characters can exhibit flaws in logic. The ability to depict genius relies on the author's skill in crafting believable scenarios and character insights, rather than their own intellectual prowess. The discussion also touches on the challenges of convincing modern readers of a character's genius, especially when outdated or nonsensical reasoning is involved. Ultimately, the consensus is that a bright author can create a genius character by effectively engaging the reader's imagination and presenting the character's thought processes in a relatable manner.
  • #31
Usain Bolt in the picture looks like he is playing checkers with the chess pieces.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
mpresic3 said:
Usain Bolt in the picture looks like he is playing checkers with the chess pieces.

Wow, you totally called it.
 
  • #33
Office_Shredder said:
Wow, you totally called it.
And it is still a nonsensical position. White is making its second move before black has moved once.
 
  • #34
That is OK. I think unlike chess, the dark pieces move first in checkers?
 
  • #35
1616262959391.png
 
  • Haha
Likes Paul Colby and BillTre
  • #36
cybernetichero said:
.So can a merely bright person (convincingly) write a genius character?

Are you talking about convincing readers who are non-geniuses?
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #37
Genius is really a label that’s meaningful only in retrospect. I think there are acts or contributions of genius, as people not so much. There are many very smart people who never contribute anything of note.