Can a PhD in experimental physics lead to a career in banking?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A PhD in experimental physics can lead to a career in banking, particularly in quantitative roles, but the transition is more feasible for those with backgrounds in high-energy physics or astrophysics due to their extensive programming and data analysis experience. In contrast, graduates from fields like quantum optics or experimental atomic physics may lack the necessary skills for quantitative positions, as their training often involves more hands-on experimentation rather than data analysis. The traditional pathway to becoming a quant typically involves a PhD in physics or mathematics, rather than accounting or statistics.

PREREQUISITES
  • PhD in Physics or Mathematics
  • Experience in Programming and Data Analysis
  • Understanding of Quantitative Finance Principles
  • Familiarity with High-Energy Physics or Astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of programming in quantitative finance
  • Explore data analysis techniques used in high-energy physics
  • Investigate the job market for quants and required qualifications
  • Learn about the transition pathways from experimental physics to finance
USEFUL FOR

Individuals with a PhD in physics, especially those considering a career shift to quantitative finance, as well as academic advisors and career counselors guiding students in STEM fields.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

It is not seldom to hear about a physicist who did his/her PhD in theoretical high-energy physics/astro-physics/solid state, who then move on to a rather quantitative position in the industry, e.g. in a bank. I hear the same about people that did an experimental PhD, where statistics and programming were used extensively (experimental high-energy physics).

But what about the "soft" topics, such as experimental atomic physics, quantum optics and such. Can they also move on to a quantitative position in the banking industry, or is it more common for them to "settle" with industrial experimental work? Do people know of any statistics for this, or have any experience/opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to work in a bank take accounting and statistics classes if you want to be a physicist then take physics classes. sorry I don't have any stats for this
 
akdude1 said:
If you want to work in a bank take accounting and statistics classes if you want to be a physicist then take physics classes. sorry I don't have any stats for this

He was asking about working as a quant. It is extremely unlikely that you would be able to find a job as a quant if you study accounting, and statistics is probably not ideal either. The "traditional" background for a quant would be a PhD in physics or maths.

To answer the OP. I don't know for sure, but I am under the impression that the reason high-energy/astro PhDs can find jobs as quants is that many of them spend a LOT of time programming and analyzing data. After all, the actual experiments (observation, time at an accelerator etc) might only take up a few days per year and the rest of the time is spent sorting through vast amounts of data.

A PhD in say quantum optics, experimental solid-state etc. is very different and you would spend a lot more time doing actual experiments (and a lot of hands-on work), and you might not even have to do any advanced data analysis. Hence, you are less likely to pick up skills relevant to being a quant. I know of a few people who have moved from solid-state to finance, but that was several years ago when the job market for quants was much better than it is now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K