Undergrad Can an object accelerate at a constant pace forever?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An object can accelerate at a constant rate of 6 m/s² indefinitely without reaching the speed of light, provided it has an unlimited fuel supply and is in a vacuum. An observer on the object will experience a constant acceleration without additional effects as velocity approaches the speed of light. The time it takes for a ball to fall from a height of 1 meter to the surface of the accelerating object remains constant, regardless of whether the object is moving at 25% or 75% the speed of light. Speed is relative, and the physics governing the fall is unaffected by the object's velocity relative to an inertial frame.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Knowledge of proper acceleration and inertial frames
  • Familiarity with time dilation effects
  • Basic concepts of gravitational effects in accelerating frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of constant acceleration in special relativity
  • Explore the concept of time dilation in accelerating frames
  • Study the effects of relativistic speeds on physical processes
  • Investigate the relationship between acceleration and perceived gravity in spacecraft
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and students of relativity interested in the effects of constant acceleration and relativistic physics.

Zaephou
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Considering special relativity, let us take an object accelerating at a rate of 6m/s^2. Let's say that this object is large enough for an observer to securely stand on it while it is accelerating.

Would this object be able to accelerate at this rate forever without reaching the speed of light, and if so, what affects would the observer feel as the velocity reaches the speed of light?

Side question: Let's say a ball is held up 1m above the surface of this object, and is let go. Would the time the ball takes to reach the surface differ if the velocity of the object was at 25% the speed of light compared to 75% the speed of light?

Also, what would happen (if anything), if the object is traveling at a velocity of 299,792,457m/s (one less that the speed of light)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zaephou said:
Considering special relativity, let us take an object accelerating at a rate of 6m/s^2.
Let's assume that's a proper acceleration, as measured by an accelerometer on the object.
Zaephou said:
Let's say that this object is large enough for an observer to securely stand on it while it is accelerating.

Would this object be able to accelerate at this rate forever without reaching the speed of light, and if so, what affects would the observer feel as the velocity reaches the speed of light?
If fuel doesn't run out yes. And if we assume an empty space without any gas, dust, rocks or background radiation then the observer will just feel a constant acceleration forever, nothing else.
Zaephou said:
Side question: Let's say a ball is held up 1m above the surface of this object, and is let go. Would the time the ball takes to reach the surface differ if the velocity of the object was at 25% the speed of light compared to 75% the speed of light?
You may want to come up with some other question that doesn't imply gravity. Otherwise all physical processes take the usual amount of time, measured with the observe's clock.
Zaephou said:
Also, what would happen (if anything), if the object is traveling at a velocity of 299,792,457m/s (one less that the speed of light)?
Nothing, speed is relative. You are currently traveling at almost the speed of light relative to some high-energy cosmic particle.
 
If, by constant acceleration you mean "as measured in a given inertial frame", the answer is no, it cannot continue indefinitely. If you mean, can a rocket accelerate such that objects inside experience constant g-force forever, the answer is yes (barring the practical constraints mentioned in Vitro's post). In this case, the time for an object to fall from from the top of the rocket to the bottom, as measured by the bottom (there are some subtleties here, which I will gloss over for the moment; suffice it to say, you have to define carefully what yo mean by this because there is time dilation of clocks at the bottom of the rocket compared to the top), will remain the same, always. Specifically, even if the the rocket is moving 1 cm/sec less that c per some initial inertial frame, the top to bottom fall measurement as done in the rocket will be the same as when the rocket was moving at 1 meter/sec per this initial inertial frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
5K