Can Analytic Functions Exhibit These Complex Behaviors?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Markov2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on complex analysis, specifically the behavior of analytic functions and their properties. Key topics include the application of Morera's Theorem for proving analyticity, the exploration of bijective analytic functions on closed disks, and the computation of the Laurent series for the function \( f(z) = \log \frac{z-1}{z+1} \). The participants also discuss the implications of Liouville's theorem in relation to the existence of analytic functions in specific domains.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of analytic functions in complex analysis
  • Familiarity with Morera's Theorem and Liouville's Theorem
  • Knowledge of Laurent series and their convergence
  • Basic concepts of topology in relation to complex domains
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Morera's Theorem in proving the analyticity of functions
  • Learn about the properties of bijective analytic functions and their inverses
  • Explore the computation of Laurent series for various complex functions
  • Investigate the applications of Liouville's Theorem in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties and behaviors of analytic functions in complex domains.

Markov2
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Denote $D=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z|<1\}$

1) Let $\mathcal U\to\mathbb C$ open and $L\subset\mathbb C$ a line. If $f:\mathcal U\to\mathbb C$ is a continuous function which is analytic on all the points $z\in\mathcal U\cap L^c,$ show that $f$ is analytic on $\mathcal U.$

2) Does exist a function $f:\overline D\to\mathbb C$ analytic, bijective and with analytic inverse?

3) Compute the Laurent series of $f(z)=\log\dfrac{z-1}{z+1}$ around $z=0.$ Show where the series converges to $f.$

4) Let $R>0$ and $\Omega=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z-1|-|z|>R\}.$ Does exist an analytic function $f:\mathbb C\to\Omega$ ?

Attempts:

1) No ideas here, what is the key theorem?

2) I think it doesn't, but I don't see a counterexample.

3) I have a problem here, I don't know if $|z|<1$ or $|z|>1,$ which one should I assume? Because I can write $\displaystyle f(z) = \log \left( {1 - \frac{1}{z}} \right) - \log \left( {1 + \frac{1}{z}} \right) = - \sum\limits_{k = 1}^\infty {\frac{1}{k}{{\left( { - \frac{1}{z}} \right)}^k}} + \sum\limits_{k = 1}^\infty {\frac{1}{k}{{\left( {\frac{1}{z}} \right)}^k}} ,$ which converges for $\dfrac1{|z|}<1,$ so that means indeed that $|z|>1,$ does this make sense?

4) Well first some of algebra, we have $|z-1|-|z|=\sqrt{(x-1)^2+y^2}-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}>R,$ this is very, very messy, is there a way to indentify the curve? Because by having that I could conclude that such function exists or doesn't.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2) Hint: if such a function $f$ exists, its inverse cannot be analytic by Liouville theorem.
 
Okay so you're looking for a contradiction, but how do you use Liouville to prove it?

Can you please check my attempts or help me with other problems please?
 
$f^{-1}$ is analytic, since $f^{-1}(z)\in\overline D$ we have $|f^{-1}(z)|\leq 1$ for all $z\in\mathbb C$, so $f^{-1}$ is constant. In particular it cannot be injective, so we got the contradiction.

In fact, there is a theorem of Riemann, which says that for each simply connected open $U$ subset of $\mathbb C$ (i.e. without holes) which is different from $\mathbb C$ we can find $f\colon U\to D$ analytic and bijective.
 
Very nice, I can get it now.

Can you help me with other problems please?
 
girdav said:
2) Hint: if such a function $f$ exists, its inverse cannot be analytic by Liouville theorem.

Or you could just use the fact that any such $f$ is a homeomorphism, $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ is compact, and $\mathbb{C}$ is not.
 
Can anybody give me a hand for 1) and 4) please? Is my work for 3) correct?
 
For problem 1) it looks like Morera's Theorem works, but I don't know how to make it, how to do it?
 
AlexYoucis: in fact I didn't see $f$ was supposed to be defined on $\bar D$; indeed in this case we don't need complex analysis argument but only topological one. But the question is more interesting with $D$ instead of $\bar D$.

Markov: for question 3 you have to specify which branch of logarithm you are using.
 
  • #10
For problem 1), it should be $\mathcal U\subset\mathbb C,$ but now I see the problem, isn't it easy? Because $\mathcal U\cap L^c=\mathcal U$ and the conclusion follows.

Could you help me for problem 4)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K