Functions.wolfram.com accepted and published my formula for Gamma Fn

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 2K views
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
I sent them an email about a week or so ago with the images of the following from the solutions to exercises section 1 of my Insight Article A Path to Fractional Integral Representations of Some Special Functions:

1.9) Use partial fraction decomposition and the Euler limit definition of the Gamma function ##\Gamma ( z ) := \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \frac{\lambda ! \lambda ^{z - 1}}{z ( z + 1 ) \cdots ( z + \lambda - 1 ) }## to show that ##\forall z \notin {\mathbb{Z}^ - } \cup \left\{ 0 \right\} ,##
$$\Gamma ( z ) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \, \lambda ^{z - 1} \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} ( -1) ^k ( \lambda - k ) \left. _{\lambda} C_{k} \right. ( z + k )^{ - 1}$$
where ##\left. _{\lambda} C_{k} \right. ## is a binomial coefficient and ##:=## means "defined to be".
Start by finding the partial fraction decomposition of ##\tfrac{1}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}}## . This is just algebra, set
$$\begin{gathered} \tfrac{1}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}} = \tfrac{{{a_0}}}{z} + \tfrac{{{a_1}}}{{z + 1}} + \cdots + \tfrac{a_{\lambda - 1}}{{z + \lambda - 1}} \\ = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {\tfrac{{{a_k}}}{{z + k}}} \\ \end{gathered}$$
(where the second equality is just more compact notation). Multiply by the common denominator to arrive at
$$1 = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {{a_k}\prod\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} m = 0 \\ m \ne k \end{subarray}} ^{\lambda - 1} {\left( {z + m} \right)} }$$
To solve this equation for the unknown coefficients ##{a_k}##, set ##z = - n##, for each ##n = 0,1, \ldots ,\lambda - 1##. Then
$$1 = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {{a_k}\prod\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} m = 0 \\ m \ne k \end{subarray} }^{\lambda - 1} {\left( {m - n} \right)} } \Rightarrow {a_n} = {\left\{ {\prod\limits_{\begin{subarray}{l} m = 0 \\ m \ne n \end{subarray}} ^{\lambda - 1} {\left( {m - n} \right)} } \right\}^{ - 1}}$$
from which ##{a_n} = \tfrac{1}{{\left( { - n} \right)\left( {1 - n} \right) \cdots \left( { - 1} \right) \cdot 1 \cdot 2 \cdots \left( {\lambda - n - 1} \right)}} = \tfrac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^n}}}{{n!\left( {\lambda - n - 1} \right)!}}##. Therefore the desired partial fraction decomposition is
$$\boxed{\frac{1}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}} = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {\left[ {\frac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}}}{{k!\left( {\lambda - k - 1} \right)!}} \cdot \frac{1}{{z + k}}} \right]} }$$
Hence from the Euler limit form of the Gamma function we have that
$$\Gamma \left( z \right): = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \frac{{\lambda !{\lambda ^{z - 1}}}}{{z\left( {z + 1} \right) \cdots \left( {z + \lambda - 1} \right)}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \left[ {\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {\tfrac{{{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}\lambda !{\lambda ^{z - 1}}}}{{k!\left( {\lambda - k - 1} \right)!}} \cdot \tfrac{1}{{z + k}}} } \right]$$
which I simplified to
$$\Gamma \left( z \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\lambda \to \infty } \,{\lambda ^{z - 1}}\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\lambda - 1} {{{\left( { - 1} \right)}^k}\left( {\lambda - k} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \lambda \\ k \end{array}} \right){{\left( {z + k} \right)}^{ - 1}}} $$
*********************End*********************
I checked my email today and they said my formula was published tohttps://functions.wolfram.com/GammaBetaErf/Gamma/09/0003/
Edit: there's some kind of issue with the link I was emailed it doesn't appear to be the correct formula, I have emailed back and awaiting a response.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: quasar987, CGandC, DrClaude and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Ehm, now the first section seems deleted, I guess you still editing...

I guess I should 've made the straightforward implication that ##\alpha## is the solution to the equation $$u^{\alpha-1}e^{-u}=u^{z-1}$$

But then again it is not so straightforward if we can treat it as constant with respect to ##u##.
 
Last edited:
Sorry @Delta2 Oh nvm, you did. Yes the first section which contained an alpha was part of the previous problem and was removed, there's more (I think) to the beginning of the second part now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
When I click on the link, my browser doesn't seem to display all the page correctly, but what I can see clearly is that $$\Gamma(z)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{(1)_nn^{z-1}}{(z)_n}$$. This doesn't look exactly as your formula...