Can Antimatter weapons generate quark-gluon plasma?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter petergreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Plasma
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that a hypothetical antimatter bomb explosion does not generate sufficient temperatures to create quark-gluon plasma (QGP). The energy from positron-electron annihilation is approximately 0.511 MeV, while proton-antiproton annihilation yields 1.8766 GeV, both of which are below the required 175 MeV per particle for QGP formation. The consensus is that ordinary antimatter annihilation cannot produce QGP, and while cosmic particles might interact to form QGP, this is speculative and not directly related to antimatter weapons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, specifically quark-gluon plasma.
  • Knowledge of antimatter interactions, particularly positron-electron and proton-antiproton annihilation.
  • Familiarity with energy scales in particle physics, including MeV and GeV.
  • Basic comprehension of nuclear physics, especially regarding nucleon interactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the conditions necessary for quark-gluon plasma formation in high-energy physics.
  • Explore the implications of cosmic ray interactions with Earth's atmosphere on particle physics.
  • Study the differences between light and heavy nuclei in the context of relativistic heavy ion collisions.
  • Investigate current experimental setups for creating quark-gluon plasma, such as those at CERN.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students studying high-energy interactions will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the properties and formation of quark-gluon plasma.

petergreat
Messages
266
Reaction score
4
Is the temperature of a hypothetical antimatter bomb explosion sufficiently high to heat the surrounding matter into quark-gluon plasma? I guess not, but just want to ask you guys for sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
petergreat said:
Is the temperature of a hypothetical antimatter bomb explosion sufficiently high to heat the surrounding matter into quark-gluon plasma? I guess not, but just want to ask you guys for sure.

Well, I can't speculate about a nonexistent weapon, but the energies of usual positron-electron annihilation is a over a hundred MeV and change less than what you need for the formation of a QGP.
 
petergreat said:
Is the temperature of a hypothetical antimatter bomb explosion sufficiently high to heat the surrounding matter into quark-gluon plasma? I guess not, but just want to ask you guys for sure.
In short - no.

Proton-antiproton annihilation would yield pions - with a combined total energy = 2 mpc2 = 1.8766 GeV, which is well below the energy for quark separation.

Electron-positron annihilation would yield 0.511 MeV gamma rays.

One will not observe a quark-gluon plasma from ordinary antimatter annihilation.

There is some speculation the quark-gluon plasmas might for under extremely energetic cosmic particles interacting with nuclei in the Earth's atmosphere.
 
Astronuc said:
Proton-antiproton annihilation would yield pions - with a combined total energy = 2 mpc2 = 1.8766 GeV, which is well below the energy for quark separation.

Hmm...Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark-gluon_plasma says a quark-gluon plasma occurs at about 175 MeV per particle (by which I assume they mean 175 MeV/A, not 175 MeV per quark). So it's not immediately obvious to me that 938-MeV pions couldn't do the job, simply based on the energy scales. If a single 938-MeV pion donated all its energy to an alpha particle, the energy per nucleon would be above 175 MeV/A.

However, I suspect that you wouldn't get a QGP this way because the pion would probably just knock a single nucleon out of the target nucleus. You need to thermalize all that energy if you want a QGP.

I also don't know whether the conditions for a QGP are significantly different in light nuclei. I suspect that it's harder to get a QGP in light nuclei, since they use heavy nuclei in relativistic heavy ion physics.

I would also caution the OP about the distinction between (a) creating a QGP in some small number of nuclei, and (b) creating a QGP in bulk matter. I don't think the latter would happen.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K