Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm reading the SU(N) chapter in Jones' Group theory book. In SU(3) we have these 3 component spinors which transform as [tex] \psi^{'}_{a}=U_{a}^{..b}\psi_{b} [/tex] and we have upper spinors defined by [tex]\psi^{a}=\epsilon^{abc}\phi_{[bc]}[/tex]

Now if consider building up higher-dimensional reps, by taking Kronecker products. Starting with [tex] 3 \otimes \bar{3} [/tex]:

[tex]\psi_{a}\bar{\psi}^{b}=\left( \psi_{a}\bar{\psi}^{b}-\tfrac{1}{3}\delta^{b}_{a}\psi_{c}\bar{\psi}}^{c}\right)+\tfrac{1}{3}\delta^{b}_{a}\psi_{c}\bar{\psi}^{c} [/tex]

Now I understand that the last term is invariant, which already suggests to me it's a singlet, but I can't see how this term is a completely antisymmetric combo of all three indices. Could anyone show me explicitley why this is?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Can anyone explain this term is antisymmetric in SU(3)

Loading...

Similar Threads - anyone explain term | Date |
---|---|

Can anyone explain quantum gates | Mar 3, 2013 |

Hi,Can anyone explain why in field theory we require [f*(x),f(y)] | Aug 26, 2011 |

Can anyone explain energy levels of an Atom? | Aug 8, 2011 |

Peculiar feature of a commutator, can anyone explain? | Feb 9, 2009 |

Can anyone explain the physical meaning of spin in QM? | Jan 6, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**