Is it correct to assume that, in general, authors who have papers accepted by arXiv eventually try to get their work published in a journal? If so what should we make of arXiv papers which apparently do not get accepted by any journals? Should we take those papers as seriously as we would take a journal published paper? As an example, this morning I was scanning through an active thread on the quantum physics forum of PF and reference was made to an arXiv paper from 2005. I couldn't help wondering if the author(s) of this paper were content to just leave it in arXiv or whether they actively tried to get it published elsewhere and failed in their attempts. If the latter is the case it seems to be possible that the referees,who are supposed to be experts, did not agree with the findings of the work. What then should we make of the work?