A Malik
- 3
- 0
can we use only frobenius method to solve bessel equation?
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around the methods for solving Bessel's equation, specifically whether the Frobenius method can be used exclusively for this purpose. Participants explore the nature of Bessel functions, their representations, and the potential for alternative solution methods beyond series developments.
Participants express differing views on the necessity and exclusivity of the Frobenius method for solving Bessel's equation. There is no consensus on whether alternative methods exist or if series solutions are the only viable approach.
Participants note the importance of recognizing the type of ODE being dealt with and the background knowledge required to approach Bessel's equations effectively. There are references to specific mathematical factors and the relationship between different types of functions, but these remain unresolved within the discussion.
This discussion may be useful for students and educators in differential equations, particularly those interested in the methods for solving Bessel's equations and the theoretical underpinnings of Bessel functions.
Why do you want to use series developments to solve Bessel ODEs ?A Malik said:can we use only frobenius method to solve bessel equation?
JJacquelin said:Why do you want to use series developments to solve Bessel ODEs ?
On the contrary, the Bessel functions are closed forms which avoid the series developments.
Sorry, I cannot understand what is the confusion.jackmell said:That's confussing. I mean I look in my DE book, even gotta' section on Bessel DE, and bam! Series solutions.
JJacquelin said:Sorry, I cannot understand what is the confusion.
For example, in attachment, two ODEs are compared.
Both solutions can be expressed on closed form thanks to functions which are also infinite series. Of course, the name given to the functions are not the same : J0(x) and cos(x) for example. But I cannot see any other difference, except that cos(x) is more popular than J0(x). But popularity has nothing to do with maths.
jackmell said:Ain't there suppose to be a factor of 2^{2k} in there?
May I also ask how is that first equation solved directly if one does not know before-hand, it is a Bessel DE? I think we'd have to resort to power series. However, the OP I think is asking, is there another way other than power series to solve it?
By the way, thanks for helping us in here as you solve in an elegant manner, equations I can't solve and maybe others too. :)