Can Black Holes Consume Light Without Increasing in Mass?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes and their interaction with light, specifically whether black holes can consume gamma rays without increasing in mass or having other effects. Participants explore theoretical implications and the relationship between energy and mass in the context of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a black hole can absorb infinite amounts of gamma rays without increasing in mass, noting that gamma rays are massless as they are pure energy.
  • Another participant clarifies that a black hole can only absorb objects that come close enough, countering the misconception that they can absorb everything in the universe.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that while photons are massless, they can still contribute to the mass of a black hole due to their energy equivalence with mass.
  • One participant describes a scenario involving the conversion of mass into photons and the interaction of a laser beam with a black hole, proposing that momentum exchange could lead to mass changes in both the black hole and the laser apparatus.
  • Another participant provides a link to an article discussing different mass terms related to photons, emphasizing the complexity of understanding mass in this context.
  • A later reply reiterates the initial question about black holes consuming gamma rays and introduces the concept of "black holes have no hair," suggesting that any absorbed energy would increase the black hole's mass.
  • Further elaboration includes perspectives on the nature of mass inside black holes and the representation of information related to absorbed matter at the event horizon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether black holes can absorb energy without increasing in mass, and the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the relationship between energy and mass in the context of black holes.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various theoretical concepts and interpretations, including the nature of massless particles, the effects of momentum, and the implications of black hole characteristics, which may depend on specific definitions and assumptions.

Jonaset
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering a thing or two about black holes, now I'm not any kind of physicist or hobby astronomer for that. But can a black hole consume infinite amounts of, let's say gamma rays without increasing in mass or any other effect? However gamma rays haven no mass since they are pure energy or light?

Thank you for taking the time to answer! (PS! I googled it but couldn't find an answer)
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A black hole can only absorb what is near enough to be drawn in. A popular misconception is a black hole can absorb the universe [or the earth], which is wildly inaccurate. Only things that wander in too close to a black hole misbehave. Everything else thinks a black hole is merely another gravitating object - like a star.
 
massless particles are not necessarily massless. They have no rest mass.
So photons can still contribute to the mass of the BH.
There is no pure energy as per se. Energy and mass are essentially the same.
 
Bear in mind that photons do have momentum, defined as P = hf

One why to describe the effect would be:
Turn 1kg into photons via nuclear explosion(mixing 0.5 kg matter with 0.5kg anti-matter)
focus the radiation via a laser beam
Fire the pulse at the black hole

The laser apparatus and the black hole have now repelled each other through this exchange in momentum. The relatavistic mass change resulting from change in speed will be apparent as an increase in mass distributed between the gains in the black hole or the laser apparatus.
If the laser apparatus were equal in mass to the black hole, I expect both would be accelerated in opposite directions to a speed at which they both gain 0.5kg each- so the original 1kg is conserved.

I think this is correct, but would be interested if I'm wrong on this.
 
Last edited:
But can a black hole consume infinite amounts of, let's say gamma rays without increasing in mass or any other effect? However gamma rays haven no mass since they are pure energy or light?

"Black holes have no hair." is a famous quote about black holes [BH]. It means they are very 'simple' and display only mass, charge and spin. By "mass' is meant any energy, pressure or mass that either caused the BH to form in the first place or which were close enough to be absorbed after one formed. gamma rays are electromagnetic energy so if any were absorbed by a BH it would increase a bit to reflect the additional energy.

Here are two descriptions to get you started:


Do event horizons appear to be surrounded by all the stuff that has ever fallen in?

Simple answer...yes, BUT!...it depends on just what you mean by "surrounded' and also your frame of observer reference. One viewpoint is that everything that has ever been enclosed with the black hole event horizon is represented as information residing just outside the event horizon...maybe at Planck length outside the event horizon (per Leonard Susskind)….on a stretched horizon.

But there is a lot more to it:


from Roger Penrose:

There is no mass as we know it (inside a BH); inside, all particles have been destroyed and gravitational effects remain outside the event horizon along with a few characteristics (electric charge, spin, etc).



Watch clips of black holes colliding [simulations]

http://www.black-holes.org/explore2.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K