Can black holes convert matter/dark matter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the nature of black holes and their interaction with dark matter. Participants assert that black holes can gain mass from normal matter, dark matter, or light, eventually evaporating into Hawking radiation, which is electromagnetic radiation rather than particles. The conversation explores whether black holes made of matter differ from those made of dark matter, concluding that they are indistinguishable. The discussion also touches on the limitations of General Relativity in explaining dark matter and the singularity within black holes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics and General Relativity
  • Familiarity with Hawking radiation and its properties
  • Knowledge of dark matter and its gravitational effects
  • Concept of the Reissner-Nordström metric in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and implications of Hawking radiation in black holes
  • Explore the current theories surrounding dark matter and its characteristics
  • Investigate the Reissner-Nordström metric and its relevance to black hole metrics
  • Study the limitations of General Relativity in explaining cosmic phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students interested in black hole research, dark matter studies, and theoretical physics will benefit from this discussion.

Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
491
Can black holes convert dark matter into matter and vice versa?

Presumably, a black hole can gain its mass from eating normal matter, or dark matter, or light. Then, it will eventually evaporate into Hawking radiation. I guess the Hawking radiation should include light as well as both matter and dark matter particles.

Is a black hole made of matter exactly the same as a black hole made of dark matter? Could dark matter possesses a "dark charge" which alters the black hole metric analogous to the Reissner-Nordstrom metric?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Khashishi said:
Can black holes convert dark matter into matter and vice versa?
no, stuff just falls in.

Presumably, a black hole can gain its mass from eating normal matter, or dark matter, or light.
yes
Then, it will eventually evaporate into Hawking radiation.
yes
I guess the Hawking radiation should include light as well as both matter and dark matter particles
No, Hawking radiation is not particles it is electromagnetic radiation.

Is a black hole made of matter exactly the same as a black hole made of dark matter?
Yes, you can't tell any difference at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bsheikho
phinds said:
No, Hawking radiation is not particles it is electromagnetic radiation.
Oh? I thought it was a thermal mix of all particles. Photons just happen to be the most likely, due to having zero mass.
 
I don't think anyone knows what dark matter is or what really happens inside a black hole. General Relativity is the usual model that is used for black holes but it is silent about what constitutes dark matter. Also GR predicts a singularity in the black hole but I don't think anyone seriously believes that this is physically the case.

Cheers
 
cosmik debris said:
I don't think anyone knows what dark matter is or what really happens inside a black hole. General Relativity is the usual model that is used for black holes but it is silent about what constitutes dark matter. Also GR predicts a singularity in the black hole but I don't think anyone seriously believes that this is physically the case.

Cheers
We all know what really goes on in those Black Holes
tesseract.jpg
 
Khashishi said:
Is a black hole made of matter exactly the same as a black hole made of dark matter? Could dark matter possesses a "dark charge" which alters the black hole metric analogous to the Reissner-Nordstrom metric?
We don't know for sure what the stuff is, so we can't make authoritative pronouncements about its properties.

But seeing as how the evidence for its existence is observation of gravitational effects consistent with there being more mass in some volumes of space than is accounted for by the matter that we can see... The simplest and most obvious hypothesis is that it gravitates just like all other matter, and what makes it "dark" is just that it's not readily detectably through any of our traditional methods.
 
phinds said:
No, Hawking radiation is not particles it is electromagnetic radiation.
Khashishi said:
Oh? I thought it was a thermal mix of all particles. Photons just happen to be the most likely, due to having zero mass.
Khashishi is right...

Although for a stellar-mass black hole "most likely" is an huge enormous understatement. These things are radiating like a black body just barely above zero degrees Kelvin, and that's nowhere near energetic enough to have any discernible probability of producing massive particles. It gets more exciting with much smaller and hotter black holes.
 
Last edited:
Nugatory said:
Khashishi is right...
Thanks for that correction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K