Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Can Centripetal Force create Gravity?

  1. Jul 1, 2009 #1
    What i'm trying to get at is this, can a spinning framework of rings build enough centripetal force to keep a mass of liquid at the centre of the frame work? And if so what would be the relationship and conditions that would have to be met?
    Really need help:|
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 1, 2009 #2

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    A spinning fluid would tend to go the outside, not toward the center. That is the principal of the centrifuge.
     
  4. Jul 1, 2009 #3
    well thank you mathman
     
  5. Jul 1, 2009 #4
    but i ment if the sphere was spinning and like a gas was in it, if most of the gas would travel towards the centre. Please advice
     
  6. Jul 1, 2009 #5
    Is that the whole notion behind artificial gravity in a spacecraft? A spinning spacecraft can reproduce the effects of gravity if I am not mistaken?
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2009
  7. Jul 2, 2009 #6

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2017 Award

    The gas will not go to the center. Why do you think it would?
     
  8. Jul 2, 2009 #7

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    NO, it wouldn't. It would travel toward the circumference. That was mathman's point.
     
  9. Jul 2, 2009 #8

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    People walking on the inside wall of the spinning space craft (heads pointed toward the axis of rotation) would feel a force pushing them against the space craft. Than can "simulate" gravity but will not be exactly the same. For example, in all but an immense space craft, coriolis forces would be evident.
     
  10. Jul 3, 2009 #9

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A spinning fluid mass would resemble a galaxy in deep space. Gravity limits the effects of centripetal force.
     
  11. Jul 3, 2009 #10

    Wallace

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I have no idea what you are trying to say? In a galaxy gravity is what provides the centripedal force that keeps it together??
     
  12. Jul 3, 2009 #11

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In a galaxy the centripetal force is gravity.
     
  13. Jul 4, 2009 #12

    Wallace

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes, that's what I said? At least that was what I intended to say....
     
  14. Jul 9, 2009 #13
    Yes...Theoreticaly this is possible. For simplisity sake take for example a ring and contain within it two elements... one a gas and other liquid. Let the gas be significantly "heavier" than the fluid. When spinning centripetal force would pull the heavy gas to the outside and leave the fluid (lightier) in the center...Is this even what you are asking???
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2009
  15. Jul 9, 2009 #14
    However, I don't know of any Gas heavier than liquid... so in accuality I dont think so
     
  16. Jul 13, 2009 #15
    So is the difference in behavior mainly due to the atomic freedom that exists in gasses

    Does this amount to saying that randomly circulating gas molecules cannot be bound by the centripetal force?

    How does gravity keep them together, is gravity stronger than centripetal force?
     
  17. Jul 13, 2009 #16
    Can you please explain in more depth what you are saying? What centripetal force are you refering to??
     
  18. Jul 13, 2009 #17
    Several levels of issues here:

    1) One is called 'miscibility' see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscibility

    2) Whether 'randomly circulating gas molecules' are 'bound' depends on their energy and strength of the forces involved.

    3) In this particular case, the substances appear to be already contained -- according to the original question. So this should not be an issue.

    4) Actually, in the case as presented -- a gas -- the presence of gravity or centripetal or any force is really unimportant. The gas is going to fill the volume.

    5) A liquid would only maintain being a liquid in the presence of additional gas (of some kind) filling any extra volume (or vaporize to expand to fill the volume)

    6) If the containing object (spaceship) is spinning, the denser material will settle against the outer 'walls'.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2009
  19. Jul 14, 2009 #18
    Consider a box with some gas and a lot of holes(very hypothetically)

    Let us say i send the box into revolutions, now by what we have seen the gas would escape out of the holes, as the box rotates?

    Now however if the gas is gravitationally bound like it is for say jupiter, the gas does not escape, i mean why is this any different? Does this mean that gravity influences gas molecules differently than it is affected by centripetal force?
     
  20. Jul 14, 2009 #19

    Janus

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A centripetal force is one that acts toward the center, so gravity is a centripetal force.

    In your spinning box, the centripetal force is supplied by the walls of the box pushing inward on the gas preventing the molecules from following a straight line path as would be natural to them. When you put holes in the box, you have areas where there is no centripetal force to contain the gas and it escapes.
     
  21. Jul 14, 2009 #20

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Better: Gravity is a central force. Centripetal force is a kinematical rather than dynamical concept. This page, http://encyclopedia.stateuniversity.com/pages/3970/centripetal-force.html [Broken] explains central versus centripetal versus centrifugal forces in a nice, simple manner.

    What centripetal force? You are acting as if centripetal force is something real in and of itself. It isn't. The real (i.e., physical) force in your rotating box is the electrostatic repulsion between the surface of the box and the gas molecules that hit it. The mass of the gas itself is insignificant. The real force in the case of Jupiter is the mass of all the stuff that comprises Jupiter. Compare this to the gas in a box situation. The gravitational force exerted by the gas on a gas particle near the surface of the box (or anywhere inside the box) is immeasurably small.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  22. Jul 15, 2009 #21
    Why so?

    The holes are covered with air which in turn would be atttracted towards the center so there should be a force the air exerts towards the center, wont it?

    However the reaction force of th gas still wins, how?
     
  23. Jul 15, 2009 #22
    No i am a little confused, Are you saying that the sum total of the force exerted by all the particles of the gas is too less to actually get affected by the centripetal force or is it that each molecule is actually never effect and it is the sum effect that we see manifesting. So every molecule is free to do as it pleases?
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2009
  24. Jul 15, 2009 #23

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    What force? Draw a free body diagram.

    You are acting as if centripetal force is a real force. It isn't. Centripetal force is a kinematic force -- it is just a label we slap on the kinematics when the acceleration is, for whatever reason, observed to be directed toward some center.

    Suppose this box (without holes) and the gas inside initially are non-rotating. Now start the box rotating. Aerodynamic drag will make the layer of the gas near the surface of the box more-or-less move with the box. This is called the "no-slip condition". A video: .

    If you have a fan to keep you cool in the summer, look at the blades. They're probably a bit dirty. They are dirtiest exactly where you wouldn't expect it: Right where the air flow is greatest. That's the no-slip condition at work. Any dust that happens to hit the blade might well stick to the blade due to adhesion. It is adhesion between the air molecules and the fan blade that is responsible for this boundary layer effect. Because the boundary layer is pretty much at rest with respect to the blades, the motion of the blade through the air will not blow the dust off. Because the air flow constantly refreshes the boundary layer, there is an influx of new dust particles that can stick to the blade.

    Back to the box that is just starting to rotate. Away from the gas/box boundary the gas is still not rotating. There is a wind inside the box. This wind transfers momentum from the boundary layer to the non-rotating gas. Eventually the entire contents of the box will be rotating (and the wind will vanish).

    The only forces acting on a parcel of air in this box are gravity and the electrostatic force. The adhesion that is responsible for the no-slip condition is an electrostatic effect. The viscosity of the gas that creates the wind that in turn makes the entire box rotate is also an electrostatic effect.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 25, 2014
  25. Jul 20, 2009 #24
    Ok i guess i was a little vague before. I was thinking of the magnetic levitation effect and was wondering if it was possible to achieve on an object at the centre of a series of rotating frame works?

    So yes only that i'm considering one element either liquid of solid
     
  26. Jul 20, 2009 #25
    Thanks DH that helps :)
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Loading...