Can communication between two distant points be instantaneous?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BrianS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Communication
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
BrianS
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I'm working on an illustrative analogy for instantaneous communication by entangled particles.

I am planning to write something along these lines, but I want to see if anyone can tell me if I'm missing something here:

"Imagine a rod that is connected in a frictionless and weightless environment between two distant points. The rod is solid, with a material that is so dense that it will not compress.

An operator (sender) at one end taps a morse-code message to a receiver at the other end. The rod moves easily with each tap, and thus, the message is communicated instantaneously between the sender and receiver - because the rod connects the two locations..."

Is there some reason this would not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BrianS said:
The rod is solid, with a material that is so dense that it will not compress.

Sorry, there's no such thing. :H
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu, CWatters, russ_watters and 1 other person
jtbell said:
Sorry, there's no such thing. :H
So that is the problem with this example - there will be a compression wave that moves at no faster than C?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
Bingo! :biggrin:
 
Awesome, thanks for the quick help. That saved me some grief :rolleyes:
 
I might be wrong but i believe the wave would only move at about the speed of sound in the material of the rod.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller and davenn
BrianS said:
So that is the problem with this example - there will be a compression wave that moves at no faster than C?
CWatters said:
I might be wrong but i believe the wave would only move at about the speed of sound in the material of the rod.

yup exactly .. the speed of sound relative to the density of the rod's composition
 
BrianS said:
Is there some reason this would not work?
This video might also interest you: