davi2686
- 33
- 2
if i have [itex]\int_{\partial S} \omega=0[/itex] by stokes theorem [itex]\int_{S} d \omega=0[/itex], can i say [itex]d \omega=0[/itex]? even 0 as a scalar is a 0-form?
Shyan said:Consider [itex]d\omega=x^3 dx[/itex] integrated over [itex]S=(-a,a)[/itex]. The integral gives zero but the integrand is zero in only one point of the region of integration. So this is a counterexample to [itex]\int_S d\omega=0 \Rightarrow d\omega=0[/itex].
HallsofIvy said:I have no idea what "[itex]d\omega= 4[/itex]", a differential form equal to a number, could even mean. Could you please explain that?
Its correct that 0 is a 0-form but by a zero 1-form we actually mean [itex]\omega= 0 dx[/itex] and write it as [itex]\omega= 0[/itex] when there is no chance of confusion.davi2686 said:thanks, but have no problem with 0 is a 0-form and [itex]d\omega[/itex] a k-form? so can i work with something like [itex]d\omega=4[/itex]?
You missed something. You should have written [itex]d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV[/itex].(What's [itex]\flat[/itex] anyway?)davi2686 said:my initial motivation is in Gauss's Law, [itex]\int_{\partial V} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]=[itex]\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV[/itex], i rewrite the left side with differential forms, [itex]\int_{\partial V} \star\vec{E}^{\flat}=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV[/itex] which by the Stokes Theorem [itex]\int_{V} d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV\Rightarrow d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}[/itex], if i don't make something wrong in these steps, in left side we get a n-form and right side a 0-form, and that i don't know if i can do.
You missed something. You should have written [itex]d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV[/itex].
What's [itex]\flat[/itex] anyway?