davi2686
- 33
- 2
if i have \int_{\partial S} \omega=0 by stokes theorem \int_{S} d \omega=0, can i say d \omega=0? even 0 as a scalar is a 0-form?
The discussion revolves around the implications of the integral of a differential form over a boundary, specifically whether the condition \( \int_{\partial S} \omega = 0 \) leads to the conclusion that \( d\omega = 0 \). Participants explore this question through examples, counterexamples, and connections to concepts in differential forms and Gauss's Law.
Participants express differing views on whether \( \int_{\partial S} \omega = 0 \) can lead to \( d\omega = 0 \), with at least one counterexample presented. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the implications of differential forms.
Participants highlight potential misunderstandings regarding the nature of differential forms and their integration, as well as the implications of equating forms of different degrees. There are also references to specific mathematical notations and concepts that may require further clarification.
Shyan said:Consider d\omega=x^3 dx integrated over S=(-a,a). The integral gives zero but the integrand is zero in only one point of the region of integration. So this is a counterexample to \int_S d\omega=0 \Rightarrow d\omega=0.
HallsofIvy said:I have no idea what "d\omega= 4", a differential form equal to a number, could even mean. Could you please explain that?
Its correct that 0 is a 0-form but by a zero 1-form we actually mean \omega= 0 dx and write it as \omega= 0 when there is no chance of confusion.davi2686 said:thanks, but have no problem with 0 is a 0-form and d\omega a k-form? so can i work with something like d\omega=4?
You missed something. You should have written d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV.(What's \flat anyway?)davi2686 said:my initial motivation is in Gauss's Law, \int_{\partial V} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV, i rewrite the left side with differential forms, \int_{\partial V} \star\vec{E}^{\flat}=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV which by the Stokes Theorem \int_{V} d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV\Rightarrow d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}, if i don't make something wrong in these steps, in left side we get a n-form and right side a 0-form, and that i don't know if i can do.
You missed something. You should have written d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV.
What's \flat anyway?