Can Energy Equal Mass if c=1 in Particle Physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between energy and mass in the context of particle physics, particularly when the speed of light, c, is set to equal 1. Participants explore the implications of this convention on the interpretation of mass and energy units, especially in electronvolts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that setting c=1 allows for energy to be equated to mass when using electronvolts, but caution is advised regarding unit restoration.
  • Others clarify that mass, denoted as m, typically refers to rest mass, which is a constant dependent on the particle species and independent of momentum.
  • A participant notes that mass is often reported in eV/c², and the omission of the /c² can lead to confusion for students new to nuclear and particle physics.
  • One participant highlights the common misstatement of momentum in energy units, suggesting that proper notation should include c to avoid confusion.
  • A personal convention is shared where relativistic equations are expressed with mass and momentum clearly defined alongside c, demonstrating a calculation of an electron's energy based on its mass and momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of unit consistency and the implications of setting c=1, but there are nuances in how mass and momentum are defined and expressed, indicating some disagreement on terminology and conventions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential confusion arising from the omission of units in particle physics, as well as the dependence on the definitions of mass and momentum in relativistic contexts.

bert2002
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Since in particle physics c can be take to equal 1, does this mean that Energy can equal mass if we use electronvolts ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, exactly (of course this is an artifact of setting c=1 and you have to be careful in restoring the right units when needed). However, be careful on the definition of m. One usually says that m is the rest mass, i.e. a constant that only depends on the species of the particle and not on its momentum. In this case the equation becomes [itex]E=\sqrt{m^2+\vec{p}^2}[/itex], where [itex]\vec p[/itex] is the three-momentum of you particle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stevetoka and vanhees71
Sure. This is why you often see tables of the standard model with mass reported in eV/c^2. And why "mass excess" is normally in units of MeV in nuclear physics. Often, you leave out the /c^2. This frequently confuses students who are studying nuclear/particle physics for the first time - you've got to remember to restore units.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Similarly, many physicists say things like "the electron's momentum is 300 keV" which technically has the wrong units. What they really mean is either p = 300 keV/c or pc = 300 keV.

My personal convention is to write all relativistic equations in such a way that m always appears together with c2 as mc2, and p always appears together with c as pc. Then I can calculate the energy of the electron above as $$E = \sqrt{(mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2) } \\ E = \sqrt {(511 \text{ keV})^2 + (300 \text{ keV})^2)} \\ E = 583.1 \text{ keV}$$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K