Can Energy Really Transform into Matter at CERN?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BlueQuark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of energy into matter, specifically in the context of high-energy particle collisions at CERN. Participants clarify that energy, while an abstract property, can manifest as matter when particles collide with sufficient kinetic energy, as described by the equation ke = 0.5mv^2. The Standard Model of particle physics provides a framework for understanding these transformations, although detailed explanations may require further inquiry in specialized forums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and its formula (ke = 0.5mv^2)
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Basic knowledge of particle collisions and high-energy physics
  • Awareness of quantum mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Standard Model of particle physics for insights on particle transformations
  • Explore CERN's Large Hadron Collider experiments and their findings
  • Learn about quantum mechanics and its role in particle interactions
  • Investigate the implications of energy-matter conversion in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in high-energy particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of energy and matter transformation.

BlueQuark
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Okay, this quite confuses me. "Energy" isn't anything physical. You can't point at energy. It's more of a property, like length. The definition of kinetic energy is ## ke = .5mv^2##.

Now, how can something like an abstract property turn into matter? An example being CERN, when new particles are created from energy when particles with high energy smash into each other.

Please let me know if I got something wrong, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BlueQuark said:
Now, how can something like an abstract property turn into matter?
That isn't quite accurate. A better way to say it is that particles with a given amount of this abstract property can turn into other particles with the same amount of this abstract property.
 
Dale said:
That isn't quite accurate. A better way to say it is that particles with a given amount of this abstract property can turn into other particles with the same amount of this abstract property.
Okay, that does make a bit more sense. Do we know how exactly they turn into different particles though?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop
BlueQuark said:
Okay, that does make a bit more sense. Do we know how exactly they turn into different particles though?
That is a large part of what the standard model explains. I don't know it well enough to explain it, but I would recommend asking that question in the QM forum. Be warned, there probably is not a B level answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K