Can Euler's Differential Equation Be Solved Using Initial Values?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving Euler's differential equation with initial conditions. Participants explore methods for transforming the equation and applying initial values to find a solution. The conversation includes attempts at deriving characteristic equations and discussing the implications of initial conditions on the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the differential equation and their attempt to solve it using a transformation where x = e^t.
  • Another participant confirms the method and suggests correcting the final form of the equation to represent y, not zero.
  • Several participants calculate the characteristic equation and its roots, with differing interpretations of the coefficients and the form of the solution.
  • There is a discussion about whether to assign coefficients to y in the general solution, with some arguing it is unnecessary.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correct form of the characteristic equation and its implications for the solution.
  • One participant suggests a method involving substituting x = e^t to simplify the equation further.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the accuracy of the derived equations and suggests revisiting earlier steps.
  • Final contributions include the application of initial conditions to derive specific coefficients for the solution, with some participants noting potential typos in earlier calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of transforming the equation and applying initial conditions, but there are multiple competing views regarding the correct form of the characteristic equation and the assignment of coefficients. The discussion remains unresolved on some technical details.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the equations presented, with some participants acknowledging difficulties in formatting and expressing their calculations. Additionally, there are unresolved questions about the implications of different forms of the characteristic equation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in differential equations, particularly Euler's equations, and those looking for collaborative problem-solving approaches in mathematical contexts may find this discussion beneficial.

JamesEllison
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Problem: Solve the initial Value:
when x=1, y=0
dy/dx = 1

2x^2(d^2y/dx^2) + 3x (dy/dx) - 15y = 0

My attempt:

x = e^t
dx/dt = e ^t

dy/dt = dy/dx * dx/dt
dy/dt = x*dy/dx

d^2y/dt^2
= d/dt(dy/dt)
= d/dt(x*dy/dx)
=d/dx(x*dy/dx)*(dx/dt)
since dx/dt = x
=(x^2*d^2y/dx^2) + (x*dy/dx)
=(x^2*d^2y/dx^2) + (dy/dt)
(x^2*d^2y/dx^2) = (d^2y/dt^2) - (dy/dt)

From this point, do I simply substitute the Values for the 1st/2nd derivatives in ? i.e.

2((d^2y/dt^2) - (dy/dt)) + 3(dy/dt) - 15y = 0
2d^2y/dt^2 - 2dy/dy +3dy/dt - 15y = 0

2m^2 +3m - 1 = 0

Then solve for m,

Then create the solution in the form of :

Ae^mt + Be^mt = 0 ??

Is that the right path? Any help is appreciated.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi James! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
JamesEllison said:
2x^2(d^2y/dx^2) + 3x (dy/dx) - 15y = 0

My attempt:

x = e^t

From this point, do I simply substitute the Values for the 1st/2nd derivatives in ?

Ae^mt + Be^mt = 0 ??

(you mean = y, not 0 !)

Yes, that's the method! :smile:

(i haven't checked your result)
 
Excellent. Sorry for the lack of real looking equations, I am on my phone.
2m^2 + 3m - 1 = 0
m = [-3+/- sqrt( 9 + 8 )]/4
= 1.1231 / 4
=0.2808
m = -7.1231/4
= -1.7808

Should y be assigned a coefficient?

Ae^mx + Be^mx = Cy
Ae^0.2808x + Be^-1.7808x = Cy
Sub in IC 1
x = 1
y = 0

Ae^0.2808 + Be^-1.7808 = 0

And IC 2
dy/dx = 1

Ae^0.2808/0.2808 -
Be^-1.7808/1.7808 = 1

Is that going in the right direction?
 
JamesEllison said:
Excellent. Sorry for the lack of real looking equations, I am on my phone.
2m^2 + 3m - 1 = 0
m = [-3+/- sqrt( 9 + 8 )]/4
= 1.1231 / 4
=0.2808
m = -7.1231/4
= -1.7808

Should y be assigned a coefficient?

Ae^mx + Be^mx = Cy
Ae^0.2808x + Be^-1.7808x = Cy
Sub in IC 1
x = 1
y = 0

Ae^0.2808 + Be^-1.7808 = 0

And IC 2
dy/dx = 1

Ae^0.2808/0.2808 -
Be^-1.7808/1.7808 = 1

Is that going in the right direction?

Excellent! You are thinking like mathematican! Keeping going! gOOD JOB!
 
Hi James! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)

JamesEllison said:
… Should y be assigned a coefficient?

Ae^mx + Be^mx = Cy

no, it's unnecessary, it makes no difference (and it'll probably lose you a mark in the exam) :redface:

then fine :smile:, until …
And IC 2
dy/dx = 1

Ae^0.2808/0.2808 -
Be^-1.7808/1.7808 = 1

those factors should be on top :wink:

hmm … usually exam questions like this factor out nicely :confused:

let's go back and check …
JamesEllison said:
2d^2y/dt^2 - 2dy/dy +3dy/dt - 15y = 0

2m^2 +3m - 1 = 0

ahhh! :biggrin:

how did you get that? :rolleyes:
 
Cool,

So the assumption of my quadratic formula should be:

2m2 + 3m - 15 = 0

m = (-3±√129)/4
m = 2.089
m = -3.589

So that general assumption is:
Aemx + Bemx = y
Ae2.089x + Be-3.589x = y

IC 1
y = Ae2.089 + Be-3.589 = 0

IC2
dy/dx = 2.089Ae2.089 - 3.589Be-3.589 = 1

How do I go about finding the A and B co efficients??

PS

Thanks for the responses :D
 
JamesEllison said:
2d^2y/dt^2 - 2dy/dy +3dy/dt - 15y = 0
JamesEllison said:
2m2 + 3m - 15 = 0

is your screen too small? :confused:

2m2 + m - 15 = 0 :smile:
 
Thanks very much. Officially on a computer now. My screen was far to small, and i was writing out by hand first to see what they'd really look like. :)
Thanks for being patient.

2[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/itex] - 2[itex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/itex] +3[itex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/itex] - 15y = 0

2[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/itex] +[itex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/itex] - 15y = 0


2m2+ m - 15 = 0

m = [itex]\frac{-1±√121}{4}[/itex]
m = 5/2
m = -3

y = Aemx + Bemx
y = Ae[itex]\frac{5x}{2}[/itex] + Be-3x

IC1 : y(1) = 0
y = Ae[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex] + Be-3 = 0

IC2 : [itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = 1

[itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex] Ae[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex] - 3Be-3 = 1

[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}[/itex] = ?

Not entirely sure where to go now with substitution..

Gah, i am getting stuck too often. I am so tired :( heading off to bed, its 4am here. Really appreciate your help tim :D
 
JamesEllison said:
2[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/itex] - 2[itex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/itex] +3[itex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/itex] - 15y = 0

2[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/itex] +[itex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/itex] - 15y = 0


2m2+ m - 15 = 0

m = [itex]\frac{-1±√121}{4}[/itex]
m = 5/2
m = -3

y = Aemx + Bemx
y = Ae[itex]\frac{5x}{2}[/itex] + Be-3x

uh-oh, you've lost the plot

the plot was, put x = et and solve for y against t ! :rolleyes:

fine until then! :smile:
 
  • #11
y = Ae5t/2 + Be-3t :smile:

(now convert to x, then solve for the initial conditions)
 
  • #12
JamesEllison said:
Problem: Solve the initial Value:
when x=1, y=0
dy/dx = 1

2x^2(d^2y/dx^2) + 3x (dy/dx) - 15y = 0

My attempt:

x = e^t
dx/dt = e ^t

dy/dt = dy/dx * dx/dt
dy/dt = x*dy/dx

d^2y/dt^2
= d/dt(dy/dt)
= d/dt(x*dy/dx)
=d/dx(x*dy/dx)*(dx/dt)
since dx/dt = x
=(x^2*d^2y/dx^2) + (x*dy/dx)
=(x^2*d^2y/dx^2) + (dy/dt)
(x^2*d^2y/dx^2) = (d^2y/dt^2) - (dy/dt)

From this point, do I simply substitute the Values for the 1st/2nd derivatives in ? i.e.

2((d^2y/dt^2) - (dy/dt)) + 3(dy/dt) - 15y = 0
2d^2y/dt^2 - 2dy/dy +3dy/dt - 15y = 0
Yes, that's good.

2m^2 +3m - 1 = 0
But where did you get this? The characteristic equation for 2y''+ y'- 15= 0 is
[itex]2m^2+ m- 15= (2m- 5)(m+ 3)= 0[/itex] with roots m= 5/2 and m= -3.

Then solve for m,

Then create the solution in the form of :

Ae^mt + Be^mt = 0 ??

Is that the right path? Any help is appreciated.
-
Cheers.
Right path- wrong solution to the equation.

By the way, while I am a strong advocate of changing the variable to convert the equation to one with constant coefficients, a "short cut" is to "try" a solution to the original equation of the form [itex]x^m[/itex]. Then [itex]y'= mx^{m-1}[/itex], [itex]y''= m(m-1)x^{m-2}[/itex] and your differential equation becomes
[tex]2x^2(m(m-1)x^{m-2})+ 3x(mx^{m-1})- 15x^m= (2m(m-1)+ 3m- 15)x^m= 0[/itex]<br /> In order that that be 0 for <b>all</b> x, we must have [itex]2m(m-1)+ 3m- 15= 2m^2+ m- 15= 0[/itex], exactly the same characteristic equation as before. Since that has roots -3 and 5/2, the general solution is<br /> [tex]y= Ax^{-3}+ Bx^{5/2}[/tex][/tex]
 
  • #13
Ah. Terriffic.

y = ax-3 + bx[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]

Apply IC1: y(1) = 0

y(1) = a(1)-3 + b(1)[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex] = 0

y(1) = a + b

=> a = -b

Then
[itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = -3ax-3 + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]bx[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]

IC2:
y'(1) = 1
1 = -3a + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]b

Since a = -b

3b + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]b = 1

[itex]\frac{6}{2}[/itex]b + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]b = 1

11b = 2

b = [itex]\frac{2}{11}[/itex]

a = [itex]\frac{-2}{11}[/itex]

y(x) = [itex]\frac{-2}{11}[/itex]x-3 + [itex]\frac{2}{11}[/itex]x[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]

Thanks very much for all your help Tim and HallsofIvy, ps your method seems much faster!
 
Last edited:
  • #14
JamesEllison said:
Ah. Terriffic.

y = ax-3 + bx[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]

Apply IC1: y(1) = 0

y(1) = a(1)-3 + b(1)[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex] = 0

y(1) = a + b
You mean a+ b= 0.
=> a = -b

Then
[itex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex] = -3ax-3 + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]bx[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]
Probably a typo: -3x-4 but fortunately at x= 1, it doesn't matter.

IC2:
y'(1) = 1
1 = -3a + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]b

Since a = -b

3b + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]b = 1

[itex]\frac{6}{2}[/itex]b + [itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]b = 1

11b = 2

b = [itex]\frac{2}{11}[/itex]

a = [itex]\frac{-2}{11}[/itex]

y(x) = [itex]\frac{-2}{11}[/itex]x-3 + [itex]\frac{2}{11}[/itex]x[itex]\frac{5}{2}[/itex]

Thanks very much for all your help Tim and HallsofIvy, ps your method seems much faster!
As long as your characteristic equation has only distinct real roots it is. But if you have multiple roots or complex roots (or a non-homogeneous equation) it may be simpler to use what you have learned for linear d.e s with constant coefficients.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K