Can Euler's Method Solve Higher Order Sums in the Basel Problem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Parmenides
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the possibility of using Euler's method to analytically solve higher-order sums related to the Basel Problem, specifically sums of the form \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s}\). It confirms that while Euler's original approach lacked rigor, there are established analytic solutions and rigorous proofs available through complex analysis and Fourier analysis. Key references include "Complex Analysis" by Freitag and Busam and "Introduction to Calculus and Analysis, Vol. I" by Courant and John, which provide comprehensive proofs of these series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Riemann Zeta Function
  • Familiarity with complex analysis and the residue theorem
  • Knowledge of Fourier analysis techniques
  • Basic concepts of trigonometric series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Riemann Zeta Function and its specific values
  • Learn about the residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Explore Fourier analysis and its applications to series
  • Read "Complex Analysis" by Freitag and Busam for rigorous proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and anyone interested in the analytical methods for solving infinite series and understanding the Basel Problem.

Parmenides
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In several courses now, I have seen the following:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{{\pi}^2}{6}

and

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^4} = \frac{{\pi}^4}{90}

and so forth. While I know that these are related to the Riemann Zeta Function for even powers of n, I was wondering if there was a way to analytically solve these sorts of sums, without recourse to it. Is it possible to extend Euler's method of solving the Basel Problem to higher orders of even n (expanding the sine series, collecting the roots, and equating terms)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Euler's argument was very nonrigorous. It worked, but he failed to prove most of the argument.

That said, there are analytic solutions of the series you mention and there are rigorous proofs. One of those proofs is through complex analysis and the residue theorem. Another proofs is through Fourier analysis. I'm sure there are many others. The analytic solution of your series can be found on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function#Specific_values

So,

\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{n^s}= (-1)^{s+1}\frac{B_{2s}(2\pi)^{2s}}{2(2s)!}

For the proof, I will have to refer you to textbooks. I know "Complex Analysis" by Freitag and Busam is an excellent text which contains the proof as an application of the residue theorem. I'm sure others can give other good references.
 
This result is also proved without any complex analysis in Courant and John, Introduction to Calculus and Analysis, Vol. I, in the chapter on trigonometric series.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K