Can Functions f and g Exist Such That f(x)g(y) = x + y for All Real x, y?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thchian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of two functions, f and g, defined from the reals to the reals, such that the equation f(x)g(y) = x + y holds for all real x and y. Participants are exploring the implications of this equation and the conditions under which such functions could exist.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest starting with a function h(x, y) = x + y to analyze the problem. There are discussions about the implications of setting specific values for f(0) and g(0) and how that leads to potential contradictions. Some participants propose using derivatives to explore the functions further, while others question the assumptions of continuity and differentiability.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various approaches being proposed. Some participants have offered insights into the implications of the equation, while others are questioning the validity of their assumptions and exploring contradictions that arise from their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the conditions under which f(0) and g(0) might equal zero, as well as the implications of differentiability and continuity, which were not specified in the original problem statement.

thchian
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How to show that there exist no function f,g:R[itex]\nearrow[/itex]R satisfying f(x)g(y)=x+y, for all real x,y?


Homework Equations



Any equation for showing function?

The Attempt at a Solution



how about starting with sumthing like let h(x,y)=x+y ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


thchian said:

Homework Statement


How to show that there exist no function f,g:R[itex]\nearrow[/itex]R satisfying f(x)g(y)=x+y, for all real x,y?

Homework Equations



Any equation for showing function?

The Attempt at a Solution



how about starting with sumthing like let h(x,y)=x+y ??
I would recommend exploring what would have to be true if such a formula were true. For example, if f(x)g(y)= x+ y, then f(0) g(y)= y for all y so if we set a= f(0), and [itex]a\ne 0[/itex], g(y)= y/a. Similarly, f(x)g(0)= x so if b= g(0), and [itex]b\ne 0[/itex], then f(x)= x/b. That means that we must have f(x)g(y)= xy/ab for some numbers a and b, provided f(0) and g(0) are not equal to 0. You will need to determine what happens if f(0)= 0 and g(0)= 0.
 


You could try to construct f(x) and g(y) via their derivatives and lead this to a contradiction.
Alternatively, consider f(0)g(a), f(a)g(0) and so on.
 


mfb said:
You could try to construct f(x) and g(y) via their derivatives and lead this to a contradiction.
Alternatively, consider f(0)g(a), f(a)g(0) and so on.

This assumes continuity, differentiability, etc., which was not part of the problem statement.
 


We know that f(x)g(y) is differentiable. Anyway, we don't need it, as the result of the integral is already there:

Consider ##x\neq-y## => ##g(y)\neq 0##:
f(x)=(x+y)/g(y) (you could derive both sides with respect to x here)
That leads to the same concept as HallsofIvy proposed.
 


HallsofIvy said:
I would recommend exploring what would have to be true if such a formula were true. For example, if f(x)g(y)= x+ y, then f(0) g(y)= y for all y so if we set a= f(0), and [itex]a\ne 0[/itex], g(y)= y/a. Similarly, f(x)g(0)= x so if b= g(0), and [itex]b\ne 0[/itex], then f(x)= x/b. That means that we must have f(x)g(y)= xy/ab for some numbers a and b, provided f(0) and g(0) are not equal to 0. You will need to determine what happens if f(0)= 0 and g(0)= 0.

so, i get this...
a=0 when [itex]b\ne 0[/itex]
b=0 when [itex]a\ne 0[/itex]
ab=0 when [itex]a\ne 0[/itex] and [itex]b\ne 0[/itex]
then, i get nothing here... so, what does it mean? Am i approaching the wrong way?
 


thchian said:
ab=0 when [itex]a\ne 0[/itex] and [itex]b\ne 0[/itex]
There is your contradiction, if you really know this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K