Can Gravity Near a Black Hole Allow Time Travel?

phintastic
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
keep in mind i am just an average high schooler who likes to read, but i was just wondering about something that i couldn't find in books or the internet. i know that the speed of light is 186,390 miles per second, so in turn you would have to travel that many miles to "go" back in time one second. but wouldn't that only be the case if you were on a level plane of time? i guess my real question is that if you were standing on a black hole, would that one second be much much closer due to gravity bending time? i hope that made sense enough for you to clarify for me. thx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phintastic said:
keep in mind i am just an average high schooler who likes to read, but i was just wondering about something that i couldn't find in books or the internet. i know that the speed of light is 186,390 miles per second, so in turn you would have to travel that many miles to "go" back in time one second. but wouldn't that only be the case if you were on a level plane of time? i guess my real question is that if you were standing on a black hole, would that one second be much much closer due to gravity bending time? i hope that made sense enough for you to clarify for me. thx.

It would be impossible for anyone to travel back in time. Time is not continum. And even if it were you would have to travel double the speed of light, mabey even triple just to travel back in time. Travelling 180,000 miles per second won't even get you anywhere probably one second in the futuer and even then it would still take you eight minutes to travel eight minutes to travel just 9 TRILLION MILES!

If you were even near a black hole, much less just a few hundread trillion miles away you would still be sucked into oblivion. And on top of that Gravity bending time would create a wormwhole. Which is why a straight line isn't the shortest distance between two pionts it would be a wormwhole (the cloest to time travel you'll ever get.)
 
phintastic said:
keep in mind i am just an average high schooler who likes to read, but i was just wondering about something that i couldn't find in books or the internet. i know that the speed of light is 186,390 miles per second,
c=299792458 m/s to be exact.

phintastic said:
so in turn you would have to travel that many miles to "go" back in time one second.
You can't go back in time by traveling in space (at any speed), but maybe you just meant that if you look at an object at that distance you see it as it was a second ago.

phintastic said:
but wouldn't that only be the case if you were on a level plane of time?
Did you mean "only if you're in a region of space-time that's flat"? In that case, the answer is no. The speed of light is always c.

phintastic said:
i guess my real question is that if you were standing on a black hole, would that one second be much much closer due to gravity bending time? i hope that made sense enough for you to clarify for me. thx.
The answer is probably no, but I'm not sure I understand the question.
 
Kt_Atis said:
Time is not continum.
It is in general relativity, which is still the best theory of gravity we have.

Kt_Atis said:
And even if it were you would have to travel double the speed of light, mabey even triple just to travel back in time.
Even if you could travel faster than c, you still wouldn't be able to go back in time. The weird thing that would happen is that in some inertial frames you would be seen to do everything in reverse order. For example, the end of your trip would occur before the start.

Kt_Atis said:
And on top of that Gravity bending time would create a wormwhole.
Not necessarily. To create a wormhole you have to change the topology of space-time, not just the curvature.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top