Can HIV Ever Be Completely Cured?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the possibility of completely curing HIV, exploring various perspectives on the virus's persistence in the body, evolutionary implications, and the role of education in prevention. Participants share insights from personal experiences, research, and theoretical considerations regarding immunity and treatment.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a study suggesting that current drugs cannot eliminate HIV from all hiding places in the body, implying that complete eradication may not be possible.
  • Others argue that just because current treatments are ineffective does not mean a cure is impossible, emphasizing the need for continued research.
  • One participant mentions the existence of individuals who are resistant or virtually immune to HIV, suggesting that understanding these cases could inform future treatments.
  • A claim is made that evolution could lead to immunity against HIV and cancer in future generations, although this is challenged by another participant who questions the mechanisms of evolution in this context.
  • Participants discuss an experiment related to testing for the CCR5 receptor mutation, with one sharing details about the methodology used.
  • Education is highlighted as a critical factor in preventing HIV, with a participant expressing concern over misinformation affecting public perception and prevention efforts.
  • Some participants express hope that research will continue despite current challenges, emphasizing the importance of not giving up on finding a cure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the potential for a cure, with some asserting that it is impossible while others maintain that it is still a possibility. There is no consensus on the mechanisms of evolution related to immunity, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the future of HIV treatment and prevention.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about evolution, the role of mutations, and the complexities of developing a cure. The discussion reflects differing opinions on the implications of current research findings and the necessity of continued efforts in HIV research.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals studying virology, genetics, public health, and those involved in HIV research or education efforts.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
Even the best drugs currently available cannot weed out HIV from all of its hiding places within the body, according to a new study of HIV patients in the United States. The discovery seems to confirm doctors' suspicions that once the virus gains a foothold, it can never be fully eradicated from the body. [continued]
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080214/full/news.2008.595.html
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Whats the quote ?
"When respected scientists say something is possible they are usually right - when they say something is impossible they are usually wrong"
 
Hah, I agree. In fact as I made the post I was thinking much the same thing. :biggrin:
 
Yeah, I'd agree, never say never. Just because current drugs can't do it doesn't mean it's impossible.
 
Ivan Seeking said:

http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198

Throughout the history of the AIDS epidemic, a few lucky people have avoided infection despite being exposed again and again. Now, researchers are traveling back in evolutionary time to understand why some people are resistant -- and in some cases virtually immune -- to the AIDS virus.

We actually did an experiment in Bio chem to see if anyone in the class had the CCR5 receptor mutation. Sure enough we found someone that did.
 
What was the experiment that allowed you to test for the mutation? I would sure like to check myself.
 
I say in no more than 3-4 generations we will have evolved to be immune to aids and cancer, its just a matter of time.
 
platinum27 said:
I say in no more than 3-4 generations we will have evolved to be immune to aids and cancer, its just a matter of time.

That's not how evolution works.
To evolve immunity you have to have people with the mutation having more children than those without. So you need a lot more people getting HIV and dying before they reproduce to have a positive pressure on those genes. People with HIV dying after they reproduce does nothing.

That's one of the reasons for the large number of diseases you get as you age - evolution doesn't give a damn about some disease you get 20years after you have kids.
 
makethings said:
What was the experiment that allowed you to test for the mutation? I would sure like to check myself.

Honestly I can't really remember. I think we ordered the CCR5 wild type protein and the CCR5 delta 32 and then took swab samples from everyone's inner cheek and compared them on gel electrophresis. I don't remember too much details of the experiment, I haven't done any biochemistry in almost 5 years.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The way to prevent HIV is education. If there isn't a cure around the corner then education is the only way!

This is slightly unrelated, but give it a read if you haven't seen it before.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4879822.stm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
If people are not working together with the same goal then I doubt we will ever get rid of it, imagine what effect the article above had on people living there! A man who was Ex-Deputy president with have a lot of following, how many people now do you think believe a shower will act as a prevention for HIV?
 
  • #12
Kinda ties into my research topic on health research. So they said its impossible. Does that mean they should stop trying? Of course not...

Coming from personal experience, I sincerely hope they never stop researching this.
 
  • #13
mgb_phys said:
That's not how evolution works.
To evolve immunity you have to have people with the mutation having more children than those without. So you need a lot more people getting HIV and dying before they reproduce to have a positive pressure on those genes. People with HIV dying after they reproduce does nothing.

That's one of the reasons for the large number of diseases you get as you age - evolution doesn't give a damn about some disease you get 20years after you have kids.

Yes, and both mother and father must carry the gene to pass it along. IIRC, it is VERY rare, and is also what helped many humans avoid death by the black plague.
 
  • #14
Obviously there's a cure for every disease... We know now how to reform genes with retroviruses - great potential for genetic diseases. Every infectiuos agent has its weakness. For bacteria it was penicillin (except for the mycoplasmas) until resistancy came, but there are ways to work around that aswell, it has to be. Viruses are more tricky, but since their made of a proteinacious coat, with many binding possibilities for anti-bodies or such, they arent impossible either. Never say never doesn't quite say it :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K