Can Humans Ever Know Everything About the Universe?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jfoldbar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the limits of human knowledge in relation to the universe, particularly in the context of particle physics and theoretical concepts like string theory. Participants explore whether advancements in understanding fundamental particles, such as electrons and photons, could eventually lead to knowledge about metaphysical entities like God or ghosts. The conversation concludes that while scientific theories may provide increasingly accurate approximations of reality, there may always be aspects of the universe that remain beyond human comprehension. The philosophical implications of these limitations are also acknowledged.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of particle physics concepts, including atoms, electrons, protons, and neutrons.
  • Familiarity with theoretical physics, specifically string theory.
  • Knowledge of the philosophy of science and scientific realism.
  • Awareness of the limitations of scientific inquiry and the nature of metaphysical questions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the fundamentals of string theory and its implications for particle physics.
  • Explore the philosophy of science to understand the relationship between scientific theories and metaphysical claims.
  • Investigate the concept of scientific realism and its critiques regarding the nature of knowledge.
  • Examine the limitations of current scientific methods in observing and proving metaphysical entities.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of physics, philosophers interested in the intersection of science and metaphysics, and anyone curious about the boundaries of human knowledge regarding the universe.

jfoldbar
i have a bit of an interest in particle physics, however I am by no means smart or uni educated. so try to keep your answers in laymans terms.im curious about something.
as human knowledge progresses, we learned about the atom, and then electron proton neutron. and then photons. however I am assuming beyond that is theoretical?

lets say if god or ghosts exist, would they have to consist of something?
meaning as humans learn, can we eventually know and prove the smallest building blocks so the we essentially know or become god?

so if string theory eventually becomes common knowledge for us, and this turns out to be the universes absolute smallest building block, would that mean that we would have the knowledge to prove or disprove god, or know what a ghost is. would it be that no knowledge is beyond us?

or are the smallest building blocks so small that we could never ever know whet they are?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no way to prove that contemporary knowledge will ever be the "end-all-be-all" of physics. It may be that our future theories are simply very, very good approximations of the actual laws of the universe and the differences are just too small to measure. Nor is there any way to prove that something such as ghosts or god doesn't exist. It may be that there are things in the universe which are simply beyond our ability to ever observe, yet exist anyways. Whether we can make accurate claims (but not absolute claims) about whether they do or do not exist is debatable.

Since this deals primarily with philosophical issues, I'm going to go ahead and lock this thread. But here are a few links that may be of use:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_realism
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Biker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K