Can Humans Mentally Handle Immortality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ferris_bg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of potential human immortality, specifically the mental readiness for living indefinitely. Participants explore the challenges of cognitive saturation and the potential for boredom after experiencing everything life has to offer. They emphasize that biological immortality does not guarantee eternal life due to risks such as accidents and diseases. The conversation also touches on the necessity of continuous learning and the possibility of memory management to cope with an extended lifespan.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cognitive saturation and its effects on mental health
  • Familiarity with concepts of biological immortality and organ replacement
  • Knowledge of memory management techniques and cognitive enhancement strategies
  • Awareness of philosophical implications of immortality on human experience
NEXT STEPS
  • Research cognitive enhancement techniques to combat mental fatigue over long lifespans
  • Explore the concept of biological immortality and its feasibility in modern science
  • Investigate memory management strategies for long-term knowledge retention
  • Study philosophical perspectives on immortality and its impact on human motivation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for philosophers, neuroscientists, futurists, and anyone interested in the psychological and ethical implications of human immortality.

  • #31
whitay said:
Sacrifice the Evil and breed the good. I mean at present there is no shortage of evil people.

Heh! Would the number of children over an immortal's life time be relative to that of our regular mortal's life time?

Evo. Imagine popping 2 or 3 kids out ever 100 years?

Statistically you'd also have to factor in still-borns etc. Would babies still suffer from sudden infant death?

And, I will decide who is evil :devil:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I do.
 
  • #33
I read that if the whole population was forced to reproduce at a older age, then we would extend our life expectancy. The people who die in middle or young age would have to survive late life affecting genes. But if they reproduce before these late life genes were to apply, than it doesn't matter what happens to them after they reproduce. Tell me if this is not clear, but it does make sense in a way.
 
  • #34
I think the question is "indefinite" or "forever"?

I'd have no real problem with having an indefinite life-span. Meaning, that I don't age and won't die unless some catastrophic event kills me. There'd be plenty of stuff to keep you interested for that (even 1 million years or more). But, as far as forever...that's a damn long time. Will I outlive even the Universe? Cus after trillions of years, all the stars will have stopped shinning and I'd be stuck in eternal darkness for the next googol years as all the black holes die of Hawking radiation. I'd be seriously seriously depressed.

Maybe I could pass the time if I had some companions with me...are other immortals allowed in this scenario?
 
  • #35
bassplayer142 said:
I read that if the whole population was forced to reproduce at a older age, then we would extend our life expectancy. The people who die in middle or young age would have to survive late life affecting genes. But if they reproduce before these late life genes were to apply, than it doesn't matter what happens to them after they reproduce. Tell me if this is not clear, but it does make sense in a way.

This is obvious. The fact that you think it's new information speaks volumes about you.
 
  • #36
Who wants to live forever?

Pick me, pick me...

My bad... I was a bit late in responding. Are all the slots filled now? :cry:
 
  • #37
hamster143 said:
Information density of the human brain is limited.

If you live forever, you will have plenty of time to devote to the problem of transferring your conciousness to an expanded medium (e.g. a suitably larger 'electronic' brain). Brain 2.0
 
  • #38
Noxide said:
This is obvious. The fact that you think it's new information speaks volumes about you.

And what exactly does that supposed to mean. My only intent was to spread information to people who may not have known it. Any sarcasm from anyone is less constructive than so called obvious knowledge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K