Can I Cancel Cubed Radicals with Division?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike_Winegar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division Radicals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the expression -60/120 raised to the power of 1/3, focusing on the manipulation of cubed radicals and the potential for cancellation in the context of division.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to factor the numerator and denominator to simplify the expression and questions whether they can cancel terms under the cube root. Other participants suggest alternative simplifications and question the validity of the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods of simplification, including factoring and rationalizing the denominator. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the expression and potential simplifications, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a lack of answers in the textbook for certain expressions, which may influence the discussion. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their method and seeks confirmation on their reasoning.

Mike_Winegar
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


-60/120 ^1/3

Homework Equations


I've gone through my book, and I'm supposed to find a number that when multiplied by a perfect cube I can bring it out and then cancel with the division. Try as I might with my calculator, I can't find one. Am I doing this wrong?

The Attempt at a Solution

I broke the numerator and denominator down and I got 2 X 2 X 3 X 5 for 60, and 2 X 2 X 2 X 3 X 5 for 120. The only number I can bring out of the denominator is 2 X 2 X 2 which allows me to bring out 8. There is no number that I can bring out of the numerator. So basically, I got to 2 X 2 X 3 X 5 ^1/3 divided by 2(3 X 5)^1/3

Ahhh...I think that by talking this through, I figured it out. Can you let me know if I've done it right?

Can I cancel the 3 and 5 since they're both cube rooted? then that leaves me with 4^1/3 divided by 2?

Edit: Ehhh...Tried doing this on another problem, and ran into issues, so I'm guessing that I did this wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Forgive me, I haven't posted here in forever, and I've forgotten the code for entering actual symbols and such.
 
No need to worry about Latex code, that looks fine- but use parenthese. I think what you meant was (-60/120)^(1/3). Yes, factoring is a perfectly good way to find a root, although I think I would have been inclined to see that 120= 60*2 and stop there:
-60/120= -60/(2*60)= -1/2. Your problem reduces to (-1/2)^(1/3). That can be rewritten as -(1/2)^(1/3) but I can't see that you can do a lot after that. If you are allowed to use negative exponents you could write that as -1/2^(1/3)= -2^(-1/3).
 
Hmmm...No answer in the back of the book for the the (-60/120)^1/3. But the answer for (-60/180)^1/3 ends up being -[(9^1/3)/3]. Any ideas on how they got that?
 
Ok, I see. They got that answer by rationalizing the denominator. Thanks for you help, greatly appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K