Can I Determine if a Formula is a Tautology by Finding its CNF and DNF?
- Context: MHB
- Thread starter hossam killua
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the determination of whether a given formula is a tautology by finding its Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) and Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF). The scope includes theoretical aspects of logic and mathematical reasoning.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests finding the CNF and DNF as a method to determine if a formula is a tautology.
- Another participant expresses difficulty in progressing with their solution.
- A third participant comments on the presentation of the solution, recommending the use of $\LaTeX$ for clarity.
- One participant asserts that the formula is a tautology without providing supporting details.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of the proposed method, and there are competing views regarding the status of the formula as a tautology.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations in the clarity of the presented solutions and the assumptions regarding the formula's properties are not fully explored.
Similar threads
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 7 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 3 ·

