MHB Can I Factor 4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor the expression.

4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2

Should I FOIL (ab + c)^2 as step 1?

I can then distribute 9 as step 2, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would first write the expression as:

$$(2ab)^2-(3(ab+c))^2$$

Now, factor as the difference of squares, and simplify. :D
 
MarkFL said:
I would first write the expression as:

$$(2ab)^2-(3(ab+c))^2$$

Now, factor as the difference of squares, and simplify. :D

The number 9 is not part of the squaring for (ab + c)^2. So, where did 3 come from? Does 3 come from the fact that 3^2 is 9? This makes sense to me if 9 were inside the parentheses for (ab + c)^2 but it's not. See what I mean?
 
RTCNTC said:
The number 9 is not part of the squaring for (ab + c)^2. So, where did 3 come from? Does 3 come from the fact that 3^2 is 9? This makes sense to me if 9 were inside the parentheses for (ab + c)^2 but it's not. See what I mean?

I was just rewriting that term as a perfect square:

$$9(ab+c)^2=3^2(ab+c)^2=(3(ab+c))^2$$
 
MarkFL said:
I was just rewriting that term as a perfect square:

$$9(ab+c)^2=3^2(ab+c)^2=(3(ab+c))^2$$

Ok. I will complete this problem tomorrow.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top