Can I Predict the Lottery Draw Without Affecting the Universe's Wavefunction?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Count Iblis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of predicting a lottery draw using quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the implications of measuring an observable without affecting the universe's wavefunction. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual challenges related to quantum measurement and the nature of predictions in a probabilistic framework.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to measure the operator corresponding to the lottery draw while ensuring minimal perturbation to the universe's wavefunction.
  • Another participant requests the explicit form of the Hamiltonian and the state of the system to provide a meaningful response, noting that they could only offer an expected value from repeated measurements.
  • A third participant suggests that the challenge of prediction exists even in a Newtonian framework, implying that the problem is not unique to quantum mechanics.
  • A later reply agrees with the need for the Hamiltonian and state but challenges the notion that one can only obtain expected values, arguing that measuring the observable would lead to a collapse of the wavefunction into an eigenstate that evolves over time.
  • A participant new to the field expresses a desire for resources that focus on conceptual understanding rather than purely mathematical derivations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of measuring observables in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the collapse of the wavefunction and the nature of predictions. There is no consensus on how to reconcile the act of measurement with the desire to predict outcomes without affecting the system.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for specific definitions of the Hamiltonian and the state of the system, as well as the unresolved implications of measurement on the wavefunction. The discussion does not reach a resolution regarding the feasibility of predicting lottery outcomes within the framework of quantum mechanics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, particularly those exploring the philosophical implications of measurement and prediction in quantum systems.

Count Iblis
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
8
If A is the observable corresponding to observing the lottery draw, how can I measure the operator

[tex]A\left(t\right)=\exp\left(i H t/\hbar\right)A\exp\left(-i H t/\hbar\right)[/tex]

:smile:

And how to make sure that I can act on the observation of next week lottery draw by submitting the correct numbers without perturbing the wavefunction of the universe so much that it won't evolve to the desired state? :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In order that we may begin to answer your question, could you give us the explicit form of the Hamiltonian?

...oh, actually... I need the state of the system too...

...and, darn it, even then I'll only be able to give you the expected value which results from repeated measurement... shame.
 
Last edited:
You face the same problem in a Newtonian universe...
 
olgranpappy said:
In order that we may begin to answer your question, could you give us the explicit form of the Hamiltonian?

...oh, actually... I need the state of the system too...

...and, darn it, even then I'll only be able to give you the expected value which results from repeated measurement... shame.

I agree, except with the last statement. If you could measure A(t), the wavefuncion will collapse into some eigenstate of A(t) which is a state that will go on to evolve to an eigenstate of A a time t later corresponding to the same eigenvalue that you measured.
 
i am a fresh student of telecom engineering. would anyone tell me the useful site in which i could find the basic concepts and understanding and reasoning phenomenan rather than only mathematical derivations. thanx.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K