Can I take physics courses at the graduate level while pursuing a biology major?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of a biology major taking graduate-level physics courses, particularly in the context of pursuing a biophysics joint graduate degree. Participants explore the implications of previous performance in physics courses and the necessary mathematical background for success in advanced physics studies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to pursue physics despite poor performance in two introductory courses, questioning the feasibility of taking graduate-level courses while majoring in biology.
  • Another participant suggests retaking an undergraduate physics course to improve understanding and performance before considering graduate-level courses.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the participant's mathematical skills, particularly regarding calculus and differential equations, which are deemed essential for success in physics.
  • A suggestion is made to seek a reading course in physics under the supervision of a faculty member, emphasizing the need to demonstrate commitment and relevant career goals.
  • Discussion includes the potential challenges of double majoring in biology and physics, with some participants questioning the timeline and feasibility of such an option.
  • Clarification is provided about reading courses, which are described as informal arrangements for self-study under faculty supervision, not listed in course catalogs.
  • Participants discuss the importance of making a persuasive case to faculty for opportunities in physics, especially given the participant's current status as a senior in their program.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of pursuing graduate-level physics courses with only introductory courses completed. There is no consensus on the best path forward, with multiple perspectives on the importance of additional coursework and the potential for reading courses.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the participant's prior performance in physics courses and the varying availability of reading courses across different educational systems. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the requirements and implications of double majoring in biology and physics.

lou6
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Please Help!

Hello there,

I need some advice:
I'm studying biology and I took the two required physics courses but I didn't do well in them, Eventhough I love physics. It's all because I had a lot of stuff going on in the past year (when I took my two physics courses), so it was a bad situation all mixed up.
My question is: As I said I love physics a lot, but I fear I would never be able to pursue anything in it any more because of those two courses I took, which were easy., and which I didn't do well in. Is there a chance that I can take physics courses on the graduate level, while I do a Biology Masters? I really love physics and I think it's not fair to me not being able to do physics stuff because of what happened. What do you think about that? What should I do? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try taking another undergrad physics course and see how you do?
Is there a chance that I can take physics courses on the graduate level, while I do a Biology Masters?
I doubt most departments would let you into a graduate course with only two intro undergrad courses under your belt. And even if they did, unless you have very, very strong math skills, you'd probably be hopelessly lost.

Did you take algebra-based introductory physics? If so, I would start by going back and talking the calculus-based intro courses.

How's your math? Have you done the standard calculus + differential equations coursework?
 
fyzikapan said:
Why don't you try taking another undergrad physics course and see how you do?
I doubt most departments would let you into a graduate course with only two intro undergrad courses under your belt. And even if they did, unless you have very, very strong math skills, you'd probably be hopelessly lost.

Did you take algebra-based introductory physics? If so, I would start by going back and talking the calculus-based intro courses.

How's your math? Have you done the standard calculus + differential equations coursework?

As I said, I am a Biology student, so there's not much of math requirements. The 2 courses I took were algebra-based introductory physics. I want hope. I know that why I didn't do well in those courses wasn't because I can't do it, I was just slacking off a lot, as I had many stuff on my mind already. I am thinking of taking a calculus 3 course this semester, so I can try an introductory physics course. If I didn't do well in the algebra-based introductory physics, does it destroy any chance I do any physics?

Concerning physics graduate school, I know it's not possible, but I was thinking of a biophysics joint grad degree, in which I can take physics courses through the process. Again, will they reject me just because I didn't do well on the 2 algebra-based introductory physics course? Thanks
 
lou6 said:
Concerning physics graduate school, I know it's not possible, but I was thinking of a biophysics joint grad degree, in which I can take physics courses through the process.

You might still have a chance of studying some physics if you can persuade a faculty member (ideally, a biophysicist) to give you a reading course (see my other post for a suggested "textbook"). You'd have to make a persuasive case that you can succeed without taking much time (maybe one hour each Friday afternoon?) from a faculty member and also that you have reasonable career goals related to biophysics.
 
Chris Hillman said:
You might still have a chance of studying some physics if you can persuade a faculty member (ideally, a biophysicist) to give you a reading course (see my other post for a suggested "textbook"). You'd have to make a persuasive case that you can succeed without taking much time (maybe one hour each Friday afternoon?) from a faculty member and also that you have reasonable career goals related to biophysics.

Thanks a lot Chris for your post. I just felt crushed... :(
 
Why would you feel crushed? I offered you a possible way out! Read it again, please.
 
Chris Hillman said:
Why would you feel crushed? I offered you a possible way out! Read it again, please.

It's just it's becoming more and more complicated. What about a double major thing? How much years should this require if I complete my BS in biology? What about other options? Thanks a lot man.
 
Didn't you say in your other thread that you are now a senior? I suspect it is too late to double major, but maybe not too late to take some reading courses in physics if you can make a good case to Prof. X why he/she should offer one to you. If you perform very well in those and do well on some standard exam, suggesting that you have a strong math background, I should think biophysics programs would consider you a serious candidate for admission.

I've been assuming you are a student in an American university; I have much less knowledge of other systems. The good news is that the American system tends to reward improvisation when you fall between the cracks of a pre-existing structure. Reading courses are the universities versions of curricular improvisation.
 
Chris Hillman said:
Didn't you say in your other thread that you are now a senior? I suspect it is too late to double major, but maybe not too late to take some reading courses in physics if you can make a good case to Prof. X why he/she should offer one to you. If you perform very well in those and do well on some standard exam, suggesting that you have a strong math background, I should think biophysics programs would consider you a serious candidate for admission.

I've been assuming you are a student in an American university; I have much less knowledge of other systems. The good news is that the American system tends to reward improvisation when you fall between the cracks of a pre-existing structure. Reading courses are the universities versions of curricular improvisation.

I am in an American University outside the States. I don't think we have reading courses, as I don't see a sign of them in our catalog.


May i ask why is it late for a double major? What difference could it make if I extend my college studies a while?
 
  • #10
lou6 said:
I am in an American University outside the States. I don't think we have reading courses, as I don't see a sign of them in our catalog.

Sorry, I assumed you'd know what I was talking about: a reading course is a "one-off" tutorial, in which a faculty member "supervises" self-study by a particular student. It is arranged between a professor and a student and so it wouldn't appear in the catalog!

In practice a reading course usually entails meeting once a week so you can ask questions about things you didn't understand. Your instructor may ask you to prepare and give minilectures so that he/she can quickly get an impression of your progress. At the end you are given an oral exam and some kind of grade is assigned. Doing this requires you to be a "self-starter" and highly disciplined and motivated.

Since this does require an investment of time and energy by a faculty member you may find you need to make a good case for why you should be offered such an opportunity. However, I would expect that say American University in Beirut would not flatly forbid undergraduate students from taking reading courses if they can find a willing faculty member in the appropriate department.

As for extending your undergraduate career--- this is a question for your faculty advisor at your university, I think! It might be a reasonable option but this depends upon your individual circumstances and your universities regulations. Also, bear in mind that arranging a reading course is not incompatible with taking formal courses in an extra year, e.g. if something you particularly wish to learn isn't taught next year.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K