DaveE said:
Could you define what you mean by explosion; chemical reaction? shockwave? rapid energy dispersion?
When an asteroid hits the earth is that an explosion? When a laser starts to drill a hole in a metal sheet do the first molecules removed "explode"?
Anyway, I suspect the answer is yes, but I'm not sure what the real question is.
For laser based material processing, this question can be quite complex and the actual material removal process depends on a lot of parameters, primarily power/energy, pulse width, repetition rate, wavelength as well as the target material composition. Sometimes it's heat based, like melting, other times it's directly breaking molecular bonds.
Shockwave. A focal point of the discussion on one end is that if it can cause a large scale explosive reaction followed by a shockwave without the target being a form of fuel or other highly-combustible material - then it isn't really a laser, because photons alone can't incite such a reaction.
I'm talking about the overall possibility of inducing a large scale explosion as the average person knows it - a violent burst of heat followed by a shockwave by heating up objects like boulders, trees, concrete and such with a single, relatively short pulse. I assume it'd take different conditions to achieve the same result with each of the objects stated.
Of course, I'm talking about a hypothetical laser containing incredible levels of energy without having to worry about a medium capable of powering and/or enduring them.
Frabjous said:
Generically, I would say that they can create surface explosions with a area roughly the size of the beam. Once you get away from that point, things are governed by thermal conduction which will not in general cause an explosion. Another issue is the creation of a plasma which will decrease the coupling to the underlying material. The fundamental question is how transparent is the target, i.e., how deep will laser energy be deposited. The deeper it is, the better a chance for a bigger explosion.
I have no experience with unrealistic energy lasers.
davenn said:
I would also tend to side with "those people"
As DaveE said, you need to define your meaning of explosion. Your choice of target for your example is important as it will fracture and shatter explosively and rapidly with the application of energy (heat). This is not a chemical explosion in the way you may be thinking that is occurring.
You can get the same effect with rock by applying energy (heat) by other methods ... oven, gas cutting torch etc.
Pick a different material, a panel of steel, aluminium, ceramic, glass etc and your results will be completely different in the way the laser interacts with that material.
Now if the laser beam hits a material that in of itself has explosive qualities ... tank of petrol, gas etc, then there will probably be
the type of explosion, that I think, you are imagining.
Maybe you are being swayed too much by what you see in scifi TV and movies ?regards
Dave
I'm referring to a generic explosion as most people know it - a burst of extreme heat followed by a shockwave by heating up materials as those I mentioned above: boulders, concrete, trees-- nothing in particular. And as I mentioned - assuming the laser contains incredible amount of energy. Not something that is feasible for us, at least not anytime soon, I assume.
As for fictional influence - I've always taken fiction with a grain of salt when it comes to real life physics, but at the end it was a discussion regarding fictional shenanigans(I could elaborate if you think this might help understand me better)that made me think a bit harder and actually explore these concepts. It helped pique my interest and so I'm here, after also having visited Quora with a similar question. Of course, I do plan on diving deeper than just asking questions online.
I'm aware the subject at hand is fairly complex and my question was probably a bit too general. My apologies. Also, I figure I should have probably phrased it better, because "I've encountered some people who think..." does sound insulting in a hindsight. I'm aware this is a complex topic and I figure I was a bit too confident in my approach.