Can LIGO Detect Gravity Waves from Directly Above or Below?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bern1937
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Ligo
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) detects gravitational waves by measuring changes in the lengths of its two arms as waves pass through, affecting the time of flight of light beams. The sensitivity of LIGO is highest for waves originating directly above or below, with polarization parallel to its arms, as this results in one arm being stretched while the other is squished. Waves arriving at a 45° angle to the arms do not induce detectable changes, which is why multiple detectors with different orientations are utilized. The complexity of LIGO's directional sensitivity necessitates ongoing enhancements and additional detectors for improved detection capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational wave physics
  • Familiarity with LIGO's operational principles
  • Knowledge of wave polarization and its effects
  • Basic grasp of interferometry techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research LIGO's detection mechanisms and sensitivity analysis
  • Explore gravitational wave polarization and its implications
  • Learn about the design and function of multiple LIGO detectors
  • Investigate the mathematical models used in gravitational wave detection
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and researchers interested in gravitational wave detection, as well as students studying astrophysics and related fields.

Bern1937
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
LIGO operation, for gravity waves
As I understand, the gravity wave detection system is possible due to the change in length of the two arms, as a wave passes, thus changing the distance the light beams travel. As this distance changes, the time of flight will change in relationship to each other. This difference is then measured, after combining, and monitored, for the changing phase angle, caused by a passing gravity wave.

My question: If the source of the wave is located directly above or below LIGO, will the gravity wave be detected?

Thank You,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Point of language: LIGO detects gravitational waves. Gravity waves are a type of surface wave on water.

The directional sensitivity of a LIGO detector is quite complex. The "stretch and squish" effect is perpendicular to the direction of travel of the waves. So a single LIGO instrument is actually most sensitive to waves coming from directly above or below with polarisation parallel to its arms, since one arm is stretched and the other one is squished. It is blind to waves coming in the same direction with polarisation at 45° to its arms because they don't stretch either arm. It is less sensitive to waves coming in at other angles even if the polarisation is optimal. The velocity of the source also matters since this can make some component of the stretch and squish parallel to the detector's timelike direction, to which it is also blind.

All of this is why it started with two detectors in different orientations, and why they have added and plan to add more.
 
Last edited:
There's a nice diagram at Wikipedia showing how a ring of free floating masses react to a gravitational wave passing through perpendicular to the plane of the image. You can see the stretch-and-squish in action.

LIGO doesn't have a ring of free floating masses. It has just the topmost and rightmost dots and another one in the centre, which would be unmoving. If you ignore everything except those two dots and the middle of the ring, you can see that one arm lengthens as the other shortens. But that's if the wave is polarised conveniently. If the wave happens to come in polarised so that LIGO is at 45° (so its arms point north east and south east on the diagram) then you can see that those dots don't move at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K