Can magnets be a cheap and eco-friendly source of energy?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lax1113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Magnetic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of using magnets as a source of energy, specifically the idea of powering a turbine or generating energy through magnetic mechanisms. Participants explore the theoretical implications and practical challenges associated with this concept, touching on aspects of energy conservation and the operational costs of existing technologies like MRI machines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that magnets could power a turbine to generate energy, drawing parallels to existing power generation methods like nuclear fission.
  • Another participant argues that the idea resembles perpetual motion, indicating it is unlikely to work as proposed.
  • Concerns are raised about the operational costs of MRI machines, with one participant citing that they require significant power and cooling, contradicting the notion of magnets being a cheap energy source.
  • A participant explains that compressing a spring does not generate energy, emphasizing the conservation of energy principle and questioning the mechanics of the proposed system.
  • Another participant clarifies that turbines convert kinetic energy into electric energy and suggests that using magnets directly to spin coils of wire would be more efficient than the proposed method.
  • One participant compares the idea to using an electric motor to turn a generator, highlighting inefficiencies and losses in energy conversion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the feasibility of using magnets as a cheap and eco-friendly energy source. Multiple competing views are presented, with some participants challenging the initial idea while others attempt to clarify the underlying principles of energy conversion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the operational costs and energy requirements of MRI machines, suggesting that assumptions about the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of using magnets for energy generation may be overly optimistic. The discussion also highlights the complexities of energy transformation and conservation principles.

lax1113
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
I have not taken a course in magnets, so I cannot provide specifics, and this idea might be completely insane. However, my brother was asking me about the idea that magnets could power a turbine, condense a spring, whatever, that would generate heat, and would make energy. The idea is similar to most other power plants and ideas, like nuclear fission how the reaction spins a turbine to create energy, except that it would be a magnet powering it. He works at a hospital and knows that MRI machines use really high powered magnets and it doesn't cost a lot to run, so he figured maybe running high powered magnets to run a turbine could create cheap and very safe/environment friendly energy.
Personally, it seems to me that the energy put into power the magnet would be similar to the energy output, but like i said, I don't really know.

Please any advice would be great, I don't mind at all if you just destroy the idea, because like i said, i thin it sounds kind of foolish, but he is curious, and I am too a little bit.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice try...It's pretty much perpetual motion, won't work. Sorry
 
I thought MRI's cost a lot to run. Magnets are up to like 3 Tesla, which requires a lot of current through the magnets. You can do that either through pumping a lot of power into it, or cooling the magnets to make them superconducting.

Neither is really cheap as far as I can tell.
 
MRI machines do cost a lot to run. I did a project involving cooling this MRI machine: http://www.fonar.us/su_siting.htm

Altogether, it demands more than 150 kW. That's about $15 an hour plus the monthly demand charge of about $2000.

If the machine is running half the time during the work day, that would be about $3200 a month to run it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lax1113 said:
However, my brother was asking me about the idea that magnets could power a turbine, condense a spring, whatever, that would generate heat, and would make energy.
Consider this: how does compressing a spring once generate energy? A magnet is basically just a spring with a different relationship between force and distance. Conservation of energy applies.
 
lax1113 said:
The idea is similar to most other power plants and ideas, like nuclear fission how the reaction spins a turbine to create energy, except that it would be a magnet powering it.

There is a huge "yada yada yada" in the middle of that one.

And, when the turbine spins to "create energy," it doesn't. It transforms the kinetic energy of the spinning turbine into electric energy (electric current). ANd to do this you spin coils of wires through, guess what? Magnetic fields! So you'd save a lot of time by using your high powered magnets to spin around a coil of wire, instead of using them to turn the turbine first. And what's going to spin those magnets (they must move you see, otherwise no current is created)? Use something like an MRI machine? IT needs an electric current. So plug it into the current that your spinning magnets are creating, and there is your PPM! Except it doesn't work, since friction, heat, noise, and other nonconservative effects remove energy from the system, and the machine grinds to a halt in...what, seconds?
 
Spinning magnets in a field is an electric motor. It is not practical to use an electric motor to turn a generator cause there is loss and they are sort of the same thing. Kinda like using a big fan to spin a windmill to create power. It will work, but its going to cost you.
 
It seems like we have an answer, so I'm closing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K