Can Momentum and Spin Be Measured Simultaneously?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the non-commutation of angular momentum and linear momentum operators, specifically highlighting the relationship between the angular momentum operator and the momentum operator. It is established that the angular momentum operator does not commute with linear momentum due to its dependence on the position operator. However, the spin operator, which acts on a different Hilbert space, does commute with the momentum operator, allowing for simultaneous measurement of spin and momentum. The total angular momentum of a particle is defined as the sum of its orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with linear momentum operators
  • Knowledge of Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of quantum commutation relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of Hilbert spaces and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of spin and its mathematical representation in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum theory and the behavior of angular momentum and spin in particle physics.

haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
I did some maths and I found that angular momentum operator does not commute with normal mometum:
[ J_{\alpha \beta}, P_{\gamma}] = \eta_{\alpha \gamma} P_{\beta} - \eta_{\beta \gamma} P_{\alpha}

Now, the "third" component of angular momentum:
J_{z} := J_{x y}
[J_{z}, P_{x}] = -P_{y}
[J_{z}, P_{y}] = P_{x}
[J_{z}, P_{z}] = 0
It does not commute with two components od momentum!

So how it is possible to measure both momentum and spin? Why is spin the "third" component, in the direction of momentum, when the act of determining momentum should make measurement of spin impossible?

Am I wrong somewhere?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum and linear momentum don't commute because the angular momentum operator contains the position operator in its definition. The spin operator isn't defined in terms of r x p or anything like that. In other words, the value of a particle's spin does not depend at all on the spatial distribution of its wavefunction.
 
Spin is not the angular momentum of a particle. The total angular momentum of a particle is spin plus orbital angular momentum. The orbital component doesn't commute with momentum, but the spin component does.
 
jeblack3 said:
Spin is not the angular momentum of a particle. The total angular momentum of a particle is spin plus orbital angular momentum. The orbital component doesn't commute with momentum, but the spin component does.
Thanks, I didn't know. Could you provide some maths? What is spin then?
 
The spin operators act on a different Hilbert space (let us call it \mathcal{H}_{2}) than the momentum and position operators (let us call it \mathcal{H}_{1}). That is why they commute. The total angular momentum \mathbf{J} is indeed the sum of the orbital angular momentum (\mathbf{L}) and the spin angular momentum (\mathbf{S}). However, we must note that any operator A acting on the direct product of the two Hilbert spaces \mathcal{H} = \mathcal{H}_{1} \otimes \mathcal{H}_{2} is of the form A \equiv A_{1} \otimes A_{2}. If some operator does not act on one or the other space, it's operator part for that space is simply the unit operator in that space. For example:


<br /> \mathbf{L} = \mathbf{L}_{1} \otimes 1_{2}<br />

<br /> \mathbf{S} = 1_{1} \otimes \mathbf{S}_{2}<br />

<br /> \mathbf{J} = \mathbf{L} + \mathbf{S} = \mathbf{L}_{1} \otimes 1_{2} + 1_{1} \otimes \mathbf{S}_{2}<br />

Next, the commutator of two operators A and B acting on this direct product space is defined as:


<br /> \begin{array}{rcl}<br /> [A, B] &amp; = &amp; A B - B A = (A_{1} \otimes A_{2})(B_{1} \otimes B_{2}) - (B_{1} \otimes B_{2})(A_{1} \otimes A_{2}) \\<br /> <br /> &amp; = &amp; (A_{1} B_{1}) \otimes (A_{2} B_{2}) - (B_{1} A_{1}) \otimes (B_{2} A_{2}) \\<br /> <br /> &amp; = &amp; (A_{1} B_{1} - B_{1} A_{1}) \otimes (A_{2} B_{2} - B_{2} A_{2}) \\<br /> <br /> &amp; = &amp; [A_{1}, B_{1}] \otimes [A_{2}, B_{2}]<br /> \end{array}<br />

So, the momentum operator \mathbf{P} = \mathbf{P}_{1} \otimes 1_{2} and the spin operator \mathbf{S} = 1_{1} \otimes \mathbf{S}_{2} have a commutator:


<br /> [S_{i}, P_{j}] = [1_{1}, (P_{j})_{1}] \otimes [(S_{i})_{2}, 1_{2}] = 0_{1} \otimes 0_{2} = 0<br />

i.e. they commute.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K