Can More Vectors Than Dimensions Be Linearly Independent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter choob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unknowns
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if a set S contains m vectors in n dimensions and is linearly independent, then n must be greater than or equal to m. Participants clarify that a linearly independent set cannot have more vectors than dimensions, as this would lead to contradictions in linear combinations. Key insights include the use of contradiction methods and the understanding that any subset of m vectors remains linearly independent if m exceeds n. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing that a linearly independent set cannot express one of its vectors as a combination of others.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with linear combinations of vectors
  • Knowledge of contradiction methods in mathematical proofs
  • Basic concepts of vector spaces and dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of vector spaces and their dimensions in linear algebra
  • Learn about the properties of linearly independent sets of vectors
  • Explore the proof techniques involving contradiction in mathematics
  • Investigate the relationship between bases and dimensions in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of vector independence and dimensionality in mathematical proofs.

choob
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


prove, if S has m vectors in n dimensions and S is linearly independent, then n>=m

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


so far I've come up with:

there is no combination of vectors in S such that their sum is the zero vector,

there exists a vector which cannot be expressed in terms of a linear combination of other vectors

so I've started to assume that m>n (contradiction method)
however I am stuck here.

im thinking of saying that if m>n, then there are more equations than unknowns in the system, but i don't know if that is helpful, and I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
choob said:

Homework Statement


prove, if S has m vectors in n dimensions and S is linearly independent, then n>=m

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


so far I've come up with:

there is no combination of vectors in S such that their sum is the zero vector,
I hope you mean "except the trivial combination with all coefficients equal to 0"!

there exists a vector which cannot be expressed in terms of a linear combination of other vectors
It's not clear to me what this means. What vectors are you talking about? Any vector can be expressed as a linear combination of some other vectors!

so I've started to assume that m>n (contradiction method)
however I am stuck here.

im thinking of saying that if m>n, then there are more equations than unknowns in the system, but i don't know if that is helpful, and I am stuck.
I have no idea what "equations" you are talking about. The problem said there were m vectors, not m equations.

Since the set of m vectors is linearly independent, any subset is also linearly indepependent. In particular, if m> n, then any subset of n vectors is linearly independent and so a basis. Now choose a vector in the set, v, that is NOT in that subset (which you can do since m> n). It can be written as a linear combination of the n basis vectors and you can use that to show that that subset of n+1 vectors, v together with the original n vector subset, that is NOT independent, a contradiction.
 
the equations correspond to the matrix which has to be reduced to give the coefficients for each vector, such that their sum is zero, if the system is linearly independent

other than that, ill post again later when i can wrap my head around what you said at the end haha

edit:

what i meant in that there exists a vector which cannot be expressed in terms of the other vectors in that set, is that if there exists v1+v2+..+v3=v4, where all those v's are vectors, then the system would be linearly dependent, because v4-(v1+v2+..+v3)=0
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K