Can Neutrinos Be Their Own Anti-Particles?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mifcvm
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether neutrinos can be their own anti-particles, exploring theoretical implications, potential processes like neutrinoless double-beta decay, and the conservation laws of the standard model. It involves theoretical considerations and speculative models regarding neutrino properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if neutrinos are their own anti-particles, this would imply they are Majorana neutrinos, which could lead to processes like neutrinoless double-beta decay.
  • Others argue that the existence of right-handed neutrinos and left-handed antineutrinos is necessary for certain models, although this claim is contested.
  • It is noted that if neutrinos are Majorana fermions, the usual conservation of lepton number would not hold, leading to potential violations in processes like neutrinoless double-beta decay.
  • Some participants mention that experiments have not yet confirmed or ruled out the possibility of neutrinos being their own anti-particles.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of annihilation processes and how they relate to conservation laws, particularly the leptonic number in the standard model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of neutrinos, their potential as Majorana particles, and the implications for conservation laws. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on theoretical models that have not been experimentally confirmed, and the unresolved status of certain quantum numbers and conservation laws in the context of neutrinos.

mifcvm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If the neutrino has zero charge, can it be its own anti-particle? If they are the same particle, can they annihilate?
Or are they different particles?
In addition, I read that annihilation would violate one of the conservation laws of the standard model (leptonic number)... How does this happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mifcvm said:
If the neutrino has zero charge, can it be its own anti-particle?
In some theories yes, the neutrinos are their own antiparticles (see for example Majorana neutrinos). But still you would need right-handed neutrinos and left-handed antineutrinos for that (which could potentially exist but not interact with the weak interactions).

mifcvm said:
If they are the same particle, can they annihilate?
Yes, they could potentially annihilate and you would have processes like the neutrinoless double-beta decay. Searches for those decays in nuclei that are unstable to double beta decays have not found anything significant (they only set limits).

mifcvm said:
In addition, I read that annihilation would violate one of the conservation laws of the standard model (leptonic number)... How does this happen?
Again think of the neutrinoless double beta decay, you would have the production of 2 beta particles out of nowhere (and without neutrinos to account for the lepton number conservation). Your lepton number would go from 0 to (-)2...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_beta_decay#/media/File:Double_beta_decay_feynman.svg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mifcvm
A neutrino has zero electric charge. Electric charge is not the only quantum number particles have.

It is possible that they are their own antiparticles, experiments cannot rule out (or confirm) that yet. It would mean neutrinos are Majorana fermions.
If they are, the lepton numbers as we usually define them are not conserved quantities any more. Neutrinoless double beta decay would become possible, the search for this decay is one of the main methods how this is studied.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, berkeman and mifcvm
ChrisVer said:
But still you would need right-handed neutrinos and left-handed antineutrinos for that (which could potentially exist but not interact with the weak interactions).
This is not correct. Majorana neutrinos do not require the existence of right-handed neutrinos. The most basic example of this being the type-II seesaw model where the Weinberg operator is generated when integrating out a scalar triplet instead of singlet fermions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and ChrisVer

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K