Can Non-Conservation of Momentum Be Explained by an Asymmetry of Space?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter azabak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asymmetry Force Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between momentum conservation and the symmetry of space. It asserts that momentum is conserved only in symmetric space, while an asymmetric space leads to non-conservation of momentum, which generates a force. The analogy of two pool balls colliding illustrates that while energy can be conserved, momentum cannot if the balls bounce back with their original speeds. This raises the question of whether force can be equated with spatial asymmetry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles, particularly momentum and energy conservation.
  • Familiarity with the concept of symmetry in physics.
  • Basic knowledge of forces and their relationship to motion.
  • Experience with collision theory, especially in elastic and inelastic collisions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of spatial symmetry on momentum conservation in classical mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of force as it relates to asymmetry in physical systems.
  • Study collision theory in depth, focusing on elastic versus inelastic collisions.
  • Investigate the role of gravity as a force arising from spatial asymmetry.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of motion and force in relation to spatial symmetry.

azabak
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
In the same way that momentum is conserved if and only if space is symmetric it can also be said that whenever space turns asymmetric momentum (of each individual particle) will not be conserved generating a force. Thus can we equate force with an asymmetry of space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's what we do with gravity, more or less. I suppose it's possible to do with other forces as well.
 
It's not clear whether non-conservation of momentum would be experienced as a force.
Imagine two pool balls striking head on, one moving at speed U the other at speed V > U.
If each were to bounce back with the same speed it had before, energy would be conserved but not momentum. Seems to me you could not interpret this as the intervention of a mysterious force in a consistent way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K