Can our Nuclear weapons destroy a Neutron Star?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hypothetical scenario of whether nuclear weapons could destroy or significantly alter the trajectory of a neutron star approaching Earth. Participants explore the implications of such an event, including the energy required and the feasibility of using nuclear weapons for this purpose.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if nuclear weapons could physically destroy a neutron star, asking about the necessary yield and number of bombs required.
  • Another participant calculates the mass and energy dynamics of a neutron star, suggesting that even the largest nuclear bomb would have an insignificant effect on its trajectory.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that tidal forces would prevent any bomb from reaching the neutron star intact.
  • One participant estimates the gravitational binding energy of a neutron star, concluding that an impractically large number of warheads would be needed to disrupt it.
  • Another proposes a scenario where deflecting a neutron star could lead to a catastrophic merger with the Sun, potentially forming a black hole.
  • One participant notes that neutron star collisions are a known mechanism for black hole formation, but emphasizes the improbability of such an event occurring in our solar system.
  • A participant shares an analogy about the impact of a marshmallow falling onto a neutron star, illustrating the extreme conditions present on its surface.
  • Some participants suggest alternative strategies, such as moving Earth away from the neutron star's path, while others humorously discuss the effects of a mass jump by people in China on Earth's trajectory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the feasibility of using nuclear weapons against a neutron star, with no consensus reached on the effectiveness or practicality of such an approach.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include various assumptions about energy transfer, gravitational effects, and the nature of neutron stars, which remain unresolved. The calculations and hypothetical scenarios presented depend on specific conditions and definitions that are not universally agreed upon.

Zdenka
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
Does anyone know if an average Neutron star with a diameter of 10 miles, was headed towards Earth.. would our Nuclear weapons be able to physically destroy it? Assuming our technology can provide a direct hit, and do it in time. If so, then how many Megatons would the Nuke need to be, and how many nukes would be required?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
Astronomy news on Phys.org
10 mile diameter would mean a radius of 8,047m, and a volume of 2,182,454,900,272 m3. Using an average density of 5 * 1017 kg/m3 gives a mass of about 0.5 solar masses. The largest nuclear bomb ever detonated (Tsar Bomba) was 50 megatons, or about 2 * 1017j. If all that energy was transferred to kinetic energy it would result in a change in speed of 0.00000065 m/s. Keep in mind that is the largest nuclear bomb ever built, and we assumed every single joule would transfer to kinetic energy. In reality the effect would be much smaller.

There is an even bigger problem though. Even if we had enough energy to significantly move the star out of our path it would still mess with orbits. Half a solar mass, could easily move Earth out of our orbit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
The bomb would never make it to the neutron star. Tidal forces would destroy it far before it did.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
If you want to blow it APART - the gravitational binding energy of a star is =3/5 GM^2 /r

So a 10km/0.5Msol neutron star = 3/5 * 6.6*10^-11 * (10^30kg)^2/5000m
Is about 10^46 joules,a megaton of TNT is about 5x10^15 Joules.
So you would a mere 10^30 perfectly placed warheads.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
Suppose that we're somehow able to slightly deflect the neutron star so that it will collide with the Sun. Then the Sun and the neutron star will merge. The mass could be larger than the critical mass and the whole thing will collapse into a black hole!
 
Neutron star collision is a likely mode for stellar mass black hole formation in binary star systems. Solo stars tend to blow apart before reaching the critical mass. It is an unlikely scenario in our solar system [fortunately] because our sun does not have a companion [at least not one massive enough to be of concern]. A rogue neutron star could do the trick, but our galaxy is a very large shooting galaxy. The probability is remote. With regard to the initial inquiry, our nuclear devices would be useless. The entire mass of planet Earth could not provide sufficient energy to measurably divert an object of such mass.
 
I'm reminded of reading a while back that if a marshmallow was to free fall to the surface of a neutron star from about 1 AU, it would hit with the force of a megaton hydrogen bomb due to the NS having an escape velocity of about 80% the speed of light. A megaton is 5e+15 joules which is equivalent to about 45 grams which is about the weight of an egg (which is at least in the region of a marshmallow!) so it looks like what ever hits the surface from free-fall is expected to be completely annihilated, all (or at least very nearly all) of the mass of the object converting to energy.
 
Last edited:
I think a better option would be to move the Earth AWAY from the path of an incoming Neutron Star!
 
Zdenka said:
I think a better option would be to move the Earth AWAY from the path of an incoming Neutron Star!

Whehe :) !

Could anyone calculate how much the orbit of the Earth will be changed if everyone in China jumps at exactly the same time?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
  • #11
russ_watters said:
That's easy: zero!

Shouldn't the Earth's direction theoretically change just a tiny little bit for a tiny little time (for as long as the Chinese people are in mid-air)?
At least, that is what I would expect due to conservation of momentum.

It wouldn't help much if you'd want to avoid hitting a neutron star anyway :p .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K