Can Physics Concepts Clarify These Energy and Force Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter musicfairy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around energy and force problems in physics, specifically focusing on concepts such as work done by forces, kinetic energy, potential energy, and the behavior of particles under conservative forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve multiple-choice questions related to work, kinetic energy, and potential energy, expressing uncertainty about the reasoning behind some answers, particularly in the context of conservative forces.
  • Some participants question the calculations related to kinetic energy and the implications of negative potential energy in the context of the last problem.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the context of the particle's motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the problems by checking calculations and clarifying concepts. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of potential energy and its implications for the motion of the particle, though there is no explicit consensus on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of energy conservation principles and the interpretation of potential energy in relation to kinetic energy. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correct approach to certain problems, particularly in the context of conservative forces.

musicfairy
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Here's some mcs and I need someone to check my answers.

1. A student holds one end of a string in a fixed position. A ball of mass 0.2 kg attached to the other end of the string moves in a horizontal circle of radius 0.5 m with a constant speed of 5 m/s. How much work is done on the ball by the string during each revolution?
(A) 0 J
(B) 0.5 J
(C) 1.0 J
(D) 2π J
(E) 5π J

It's A because if it's a circle it does no work.


2. For a particular nonlinear spring, the relationship between the magnitude of the applied force F and the resultant displacement x from equilibrium is given by the equation F = kx2. What is the amount of work done by stretching the spring a distance x0?
(A) kx03
(B) 1/2 kx0
(C) 1/2 kx03
(D) 1/3 kx02
(E) 1/3 kx03


It's E. I'm supposed to integrate, right?



Two pucks moving on a frictionless air table are about to collide, as shown above. The 1.5 kg puck is moving directly east at 2.0 m/s. The 4.0 kg puck is moving directly north at 1.0 m/s.

3. What is the total kinetic energy of the two-puck system before the collision?
(A) √13 J
(B) 5.0 J
(C) 7.0 J
(D) 10 J
(E) 11 J


B. I solved for K of each and added them.



4. A 1000 W electric motor lifts a 100 kg safe at constant velocity. The vertical distance through which the motor can raise the safe in 10 s is most nearly
(A) 1 m
(B) 3 m
(C) l0 m
(D) 32 m
(E) l00 m


C. I set mgh/t = 1000 and solved for h.



And here's the odd ball question.


ugraph.jpg


15. A conservative force has the potential energy function U(x), shown by the graph
above. A particle moving in one dimension under the influence of this force has kinetic energy
1.0 joule when it is at position x1 Which of the following is a correct statement about the motion of the particle?

(A) It oscillates with maximum position x2 and minimum position x0.
(B) It moves to the right of x3 and does not return.
(C) It moves to the left of x0 and does not return.
(D) It comes to rest at either x0 or x2.
(E) It cannot reach either x0 or x2.


This one I know the answer to, but have no idea how to get there. The answer is E. Why? Can someone please explain?


I thought I'm supposed to add up U and K to find E, so I added 2 + 1 = 3 J. This obviously is wrong. What's the correct approach to this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check them all that closely, but for 3) your math doesn't add up exactly right. KE = mv2/2

For the last one, your particle only has 1 Joule in its KE energy bank account and it would need 2 J to climb out of the potential well. The proper way of looking at it as far as this problem is (-2J +1J) can't get higher than -1 J.
 
Thanks a lot. I didn't realize you could have -U.
 
musicfairy said:
Thanks a lot. I didn't realize you could have -U.

Well you do when you are on top of the hill and you want to know the potential energy of a cart at the bottom that you need to get up.

Basically, like most things it's relative.

Cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K